docromano

disregard post, was my fault Log.zip

Exactly the same here. Sadly I dont have a log right now since I threw SkymaxxPro out the last time I fired up the sim. Will add it later. /edit Attached a no-crash log after Removal of SMP so that you have at least an idea of my plugin and system configuration. Log.zip

757/777 make these sounds when xplane hangs,i.e. when the weather is being generated or big scenery files are loaded.never heard it in the 320 though.

Let me guess...flying the 777/757?

Thank you Cameron. Any ideas on NOAA / SMP interaction and why it is hanging on weather updates ?

I just experienced justanother CTD which I know is probably associated with the XSB plugin. While checking the log.txt, I found hundreds of lines written by GIZMO checking if my key is valid. I was flying the X-aviation CRJ200. Didnt have that before I installed SMP. Any ideas ? Or is this normal behaviour ? The crash happened while updating the weather - I think. I am using the NOAA plugin and every weather update stops the sim for several seconds while my PC is probably not the slowest. Maybe also an issue with that ? Log.txt

malombroso, on 19 Nov 2013 - 1:29 PM, said: No Gotta correct this. The new SkyMaxx PRO actually DOES perform smooth transistions - try it !

Next hint: If you experience poor performance, WAIT. SMP somehow needs its time to fade in the clouds. If you change your settings quickly, you will not notice that. Give it at least 30 seconds.

It is only in certain angles and maybe connected with very low hanging clouds. Flying it looks very good, also on other airports with different weather.

It is on my signature X-Plane 10 (current beta) on Win7 64Bit, 8 GB RAM, i7-3770k @4,5Ghz on ASRock Z77 Extreme 6, Gigabyte Windforce 3x OC GTX770 /w 4GB, Nexxos-Watercooling Do you need additional Info or log. Txt? Sent from my HTC ONE

Hi all, I was really looking forward to this and am very happy that SMP has finally been released I need some help with tweaking the settings. In general, a short overview about how settings influence performance and visuals would be great ! /edit: Just RTFMed myself, thanks to the manual included... With my actual setting I am getting very blurry imagery:

It is 110 or FL110, not at my PC atm.. Sent from my HTC ONE

That is caused by XPs weather system that generates the weather per tile (1 degree longitude x 1 degree latitude). A plugin can only tell XP the weather within that tile and XP the decides where the clouds are, where stormcells are and so on. If you enter the next tile, you will get the "next weather". This is not changeable by a plugin. The XPGFS plugin has rather precise data so times where you fly in CAVOK conditions and find yourself in a fat thunderstorm in the next minute are over. XPGFS also enhances your cloud layers by removing the lowest and adding one on top after passing, thus giving you more clouds in upper flightlevels. It also adds turbulence what I personally find pretty neat. It still does but maxes XPs options out. From what I know, the weather system does not allow more. Sure No Thats what the transition does. NOAA data is not very good in lower flightlevels, here METAR data that comes straight from the airports is more precise. I chose FL110. At FL100 you usually reduce speed to 250kts and thus stay there for a while. The plugin will then switch between both "weathers" many times because you are flying 9550 ft and then 10500 again. With FL110 setting, your deceleration can take place with XP or VATSIM weather.

The noaa gfs plugin for xplane does all this, for free. Just Google it. No need for pricy FS stuff Sent from my HTC ONE

Hi flighttime, http://forums.x-pilot.com/index.php/topic/2369-x-aviation-buyers-to-x-aviation-and-org-to-org/ The 64bit CRJ was released from the org but not here because of http://developer.x-plane.com/2012/11/please-do-not-release-64-bit-add-ons/

James, welcome to the X-plane world While I have been a satisfied XP-Simmer since XP9 and know about all its advantages I have to tell you one thing, especially as you are "from the other world":# Forget the X-Plane ATC! At least for now. Even with simple planes and simple routes it is a pain in the .... The CRJ has a complete custom FMS and autopilot that the ATC cannot deal with. Additionally, Xplane does not have any information about SIDs and STARs which already makes good ATC impossible. Even if you enter all fixes of a STAR you will still not be satisfied with the results. I´d like to cite Philipp concerning the Boeing 777 (he created the FMS for both planes)and Xplane ATC: "Q: I'm flying on track, but X-Plane 10 ATC keeps telling me I'm off course. A: The X-Plane 10 ATC has no idea of the complex terminal procedures supported by the 777. If you want ATC support for that, try an online-flying network like VATSIM, IVAO or PilotEdge." Reading xplane blog, current development is focussing on 64 bit and autogen, nothing there about ATC. If you want good ATC, do as Philipp recommends (fly online!) or go back to msfs for this. I dont see good ATC in Xplane within the next months.

win.xpl can be any plugin. Check the log.txt to see which plugin is causing this.

Great ! I am especially happy about the upgrade of the remote MCDU which makes it perfectly usable for me One question : Wouldn´t it be possible to just release the changed files and the whole package as an alternative ? I have a rather slow internet connection and more than 300 Mbs takes at least 25 min.

Then how did you do it in the T7 ? Works like a charm there although overall performance is lower compared to the CRJ

I like the resolution and the design ! I would just like to be able to scroll it !

Same issue as with the 777 remote CDU It is not scrollable ! Would work perfectly on every smartphone but you cannot move it around to access everything. Probably a simple html parameter. Could you fix that please ? (In both planes )

Done

Using HDR rendering with Squad Antialiasing I noticed that some of the lights in the cockpit, for example the buttons and the small lamps beneath the AP buttons turned very dark so they are hardly noticeable. This was not the case in earlier versions. I assume this will be fixed when 10.10 turns into beta, but I just wanted to let you know

Since Xp10.10, weather ist working, WXR functioning.

@cameron Yes, GTX560, my sys details are shown in my signature.