Jump to content

niebieski

Members
  • Posts

    275
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by niebieski

  1. I can't imagine how great it's gonna be to fly B742 in X-Plane. One of my best sim experiences over past 15 years was flying Ready For Pushback 742 in FS9. Considering you're gonna focus on study sims from now on, i can't wait to hop into FE seat with real performance charts at hand We need more talented developers doing classic steam gauge airliners (L-1011, DC-10, DC-8, B732?). I'm getting seriously bored with all those glass cockpits everywhere Yup, that calculator is handy on this plane!
  2. Somebody help me! I can't stop flying this thing!
  3. Enjoying Truscenery in AS350...
  4. Bought it some time ago. It's one of the most detailed airports available for XPX. Highly recommend it!
  5. How's it going, ksgy?
  6. Felis masterpiece just got updated to 64-bit. I couldn't resist and took it for a 700 km trip from Altenrhein (LSZR) to Hamburg (EDDH) ...
  7. It's really hard to compare fps pc-to-pc. If it was only for taking screenshots i could crank up all rendering settings to max. And out of curiosity i did when first testing new card on a different PC. Here's what i was able to achieve on a 30" display running 2560x1600 (which has very close pixel count to yours 3840x1080): https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8KO35VccXZvZlB3SWRUbTRCZG8/edit?usp=sharing I was easily hitting 3,5 GB VRAM usage and more! Anyway, for day to day simming i'm running 1920x1200 (24") and aiming at 30 fps or more when flying complex planes from 3d cockpit (FlyJSim 727, Worldliner 777 etc.) in fps intensive scenarios. Sure, most of the time i'm seeing 60-100 fps but i'm looking at the worst case scenario here. Anything below 30 fps is more of a slideshow to me and i don't want any surprises or constantly adjusting rendering settings when approaching an airport. Try to turn down your settings a little bit, hand fly IFR NPA approach in 60 fps and you'll never go back As for your settings, i think you sacrifice HDR, clouds and texture res for the number of objects. It's great we have all those sliders and can adjust per personal preference If you want to try my settings, here they are: I don't think you can easily enable FXAA without HDR being on. You could possibly try forcing certain AA mode inside nvidia driver using tools like nvidia inspector, but i doubt it would work as expected.
  8. Gigabyte GTX 680 4 GB, factory overclocked. Coming from Asus GTX 580 1,5 GB i've noticed around 10-15 fps more + i can run 2xSSAA+FXAA all day long now
  9. Cooley - PULL UP! PULL UP!
  10. Further exploration of X-Plane on a new GPU.
  11. Flying some triple 7 circuits :-]
  12. I have just upgraded from GTX 580 to GTX 680 4GB (Gigabyte overclocked model GV-N680OC-4GD) and the card is awesome. For Blender you'll also want Nvidia card if you're using Cycles rendering engine.
  13. [DEL]
  14. In that case you can stop posting more screenshots, i'm buying it
  15. Pretty hard touchdown, otherwise nice video!
  16. I simply can't wait to get my hands on the "Turbolet" !
  17. I'm a little confused. CRJ and DC-3 patches are on hold because of X-Aviation policy to wait for final 10.20 release. Now Mentor gets 64-bit compatibility while 10.20 is still in beta. Can you shed some light on this please, Cameron?
  18. Can't get enough of the 727. I wish we had more high quality airliners in XP...
  19. Looks like a Tu-204 to me!
  20. JohnMAXX, you're over-reacting, IMHO.
×
×
  • Create New...