Peter T.

Hiroshi* Igami.

Look, you asked why and he explained. And now you said that we each have our own opinion...what???

No.

I don't think I look like that particular person to post illegitimate files on the internet...

Yes i forgotten to adjust them

More

I edited Riveres texture mapping and model... changed the engine bigger, remapped and retextured the wing...modified fuselage tail and textures....and more

"All good things must come to an end" Well in our case, it is not fully ending... I (Peter Tram) decided that I will be stopping my developing/X-Plane activities for awhile for academic reasons. Because of that, Aerobridge's scener development progress will be slower than usual, and all sceneries will be directed to the secondary developer (Ryan Czerwinski), so from now, if you contact ABSim Ryan will be developing and giving customer support. I apologise for any inconvinience, blue skies! -Peter Tram

lovely plane More info= http://www.airbus.com/newsevents/news-events-single/detail/first-a350-xwb-painting-completed-in-toulouse/

Maybe you used QuickTime...thats why the low quality vidro

Fly planes that have a potato exterior the next time you start off x-plane, clearly you dont like accuracy and prefer flying potatoes

Nonorails

Cubana's paint bears a resemblance in terms of the layout...The paint in general looks totally different for me. The tail is overly painted on the American paint...while Cubana is simply one or two stripes of red and blue... the american text covers a big part of the fuselage white the Cubana text sits ontop of the windows.

Nope, He asked which one to choose, so I recommended him the CRJ. By crappy I mean modelling with pretty low in terms of accuracy, no matter how much detail one puts in the model (e.g. flap mechanics) what matters to me, is how accurate the details and the model are. But, I agree that "crappy" is a strong word, and I wont use it again in my posts. I hoped they would fix the flaws, but they didn't even after numerous request from other users. I for instance follow people's suggestions on improving my add-ons.

The CRJ has both accurate and detailed 3d modelling and system, so you're telling me that one should buy a plane with crappy exterior with good systems over a plane that has both qualities?

eyecandy of the 77 is high, but it has many flaws in the modelling which leads me to continue waiting for the xpj777 *EDIT* ...I just repeated what i said several times

Highly recommended the CRJ over the T7, if youre looking for a T7 wait for XPJ777, which would be released sonetime in the future...sometime....

Developer alliance is mainly to help, collaborate and share techniques to one another

Hello people, I and Benedikt Samson arranged and re-establised X-Plane Dreamteam, part of that process includes a brand new rebranding and a new image, we are now called Jetstream Aviation. It will be the sucessor of XPDT, we are here to deliver the highest quality freewares for you, and offering you the best customer service. The first project of the group will be the Md-11. That said Jetstream is a member of XPS Developers-the first developer alliance for a flightsim. The group as it is now- -Benedikt Samson -Peter Tram -Vincent Buttstedt -Jeffery Chen -Pierre Lavaux -Yianni Marcris -Jolly Defy Wong Cheers!

Other people other than you, sees another project that hasn't been released for years....XPJ 777

No...and not everyone knows what IFC is Howard

their signature ugly long landing gears itches my eyes all the time....

It largely resembles our old slogan...new generation in X-Plane aircraft.

peace loving...you were kicked out of X-Plane Dreamteam yesterday i heard