Goran_M

No problem. All updates will be posted here, so keep checking back.

Just to possibly satisfy your curiosity. Of course, we're limited to X-Planes handling of sounds, but they're pretty close.

As far as I know, we haven't had anyone else complain about the sounds sounding like an "old windmill". Here's a video showing the exterior with engines running that sound like a, well, a DC-3. The sounds were recorded in stereo, from a real DC-3 by Vance Dylan at Sonic Solutions. No, there is nothing you can do to change them and we have no plans on doing anything further with them. Hope that answers your question.

I'm pretty sure you'll like this one. We have a Citation pilot helping us with photos, documentation and testing. He flies the Citation to other countries like I drive my car to other suburbs. We've done things to this one that will put a smile on people's faces. It really is a fun aircraft to fly. No problem. I might post a screenshot soon. Just to show what we got working.

Still moving forward. Lots of code going on. Nothing really to show yet as it's all systems/under the hood stuff.

Try again. Don't know why, but it wasn't in the folder I had it in. I've now replaced it. Link will work.

ie. It's just delayed. The update, as far as what we have to do, is finished and all files have been submitted. The rest is in Cameron's hands. Repackaging. Gizmo stuff. All that logistical nightmarish stuff.

I've checked the diagrams I used when I made the flight model, and they match up when overlaying the flight model from Planemaker with the diagrams. I'm going to follow it up but I need to get the documents from the airport where the Duchess is parked.

I'll have to have a look at the specs and the flight model to make sure. If it IS incorrect, I'll get an updated file out.

I'll be doing some checks on the flight model and making adjustments in the coming days.

I never forget about the more important things in the world. I stared death in the face and I'm still here. Believe me, when you go through what I went through, you look at things very differently.

This actually happened a little while ago. I won't mention any names, but a developer decided to sell his own add ons and publish for a small handful of other developers. There were problems with the add on and soon after, the developer just up and disappeared. People left with "broken aircraft" and no channels of communication. Publishers who's sole responsibility is publishing aircraft are very much needed. Developers have enough on their plate without having to answer support emails. We'd never get any work done.

2 hours for Ben? He can code an entire system for an A380 in 2 hours!

Wow. Is that beast still around?? ; Ok, give me a day or 2 and I'll take a look.

Mistaking a civilian aircraft for a military aircraft has happened before. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Air_Lines_Flight_007

Not in any way insinuating this is the airlines fault, but if there's a shark in the water, you stay out of the water. There were warnings in place for airlines not to fly over this airspace.

Flying over Ukraine airspace is a very dangerous flight path to take. Just found out that it's the shortest route and they flew the route to save money on fuel. Fact or fiction? Who knows. But if it's true, is this what price wars are coming to? Getting them there safely is a close second to making a profit??

Doesn't get much more incriminating than that.

HDR needs to be ON for the landing lights to light up the ground. They are custom lights (not textures) and can only be seen with HDR enabled.

Yes

The plug in is using x-planes sdk and the sdk doesn't allow it.

Yeah, you're pestering. Instant ban! Very weird. This has happened before...particularly to the Saab, where an animation would get corrupted for no reason. In the Saab, it happened to the landing gear and I had to dig up an old back up and re-animate it from scratch. I'll look into it and get an update out soon.

Highly unlikely. Newer cockpit would need new mesh, textures, code. Probably would need to be completely reworked from scratch. The cabin is deliberately left at "lower" detail than the cockpit for performance reasons. (The entire mesh, exterior and Interior is about 1.6 million polygons as it is) IF we even decide to modernize it, it would definitely be a paid upgrade and paid upgrades are often frowned upon by customers.

Does there need to be?

Thank you for the comments, gentlemen! Very much appreciated. If there are any support issues, please post them in the forums.