Orcair

Gotta love the AF A340 with 747-8-ish wings.

I'm not sure but if you have the older version you would still be able to run the CRJ in 32-bit.

And one of the tour groups is meant for #avgeeks

I would love to go to North Korea, seriously! I would get to fly on the il-62, il-72, tu-204, an-24 and the mil-8/17. Currently I believe approx. 2000 western tourists go per year. Sign me up. And when people ask where you want you get to say North Korea! How's that for a story?

Generally I am against all-in-ones as they tend to be less powerful. However your model looks quite good. It is dual-core which is something - it wont run XPX as well as say a quad-core. EDIT: Completely forgot to look at the price. It is fairly expensive for a computer - keeping in mind it is a touch screen. I was able to purchase a $1050 desktop that has i5 quad core, 8 GB of RAM, and GTX 650 Ti 1 GB VRAM on newegg - a possible solution if you are able to build your own. (It was my first build! Fairly easy)

"Insider info" for a plane that has not flown yet intrigues me :ph34r:

Or they used your 767 for exterior shots and used the XPFW 767 for cockpit shots, as AgreMeister said.

Just curious, since it will be payware how can you guarantee its flight model accuracy if the actual plane will not even be delivered until next year?

More bad luck for a company already bleeding money. The upcoming delivery to Interjet has a lot at stake.

While this might be true now in a couple of months people will forget about it. When they go to expedia to book the cheapest flight they can to Seoul, which is on Asiana, they do not give the screeen a second glance.

At quick glance the second one has more RAM and Storage. If you do not store photos or movies I would go with the first one and then upgrade to 8GB of RAM. If you need more RAM go with the second one as it has up to 16GB of RAM.

Glad to be of service

Whatever you do, do not use google images. They are all copyrighted. However, the USGS has photos available for much of the world which you could use.

Another thing. This is their job. To my knowledge you cannot purchase upgrades to Outerra past paying for the game.

Well they are developing for X-Plane so I would doubt they will port it to the Outerra engine as it would cause even more work for them. Since they are working on releasing more models for XP I am sure most of the community would prefer they work on those first. That being said you never know...

I know that - I was wondering if he had copied the windows.xpl or whatever the name is into the plugins folder.

What files are you taking from the B300 folder into Resources/Plugins?

I am canadian and just got on. MBP 2010.

Don't I know it xD. I swear it was not because the engines overheated

Flying around LOWI in the FlyJSim Q400. I also did a 'STOL' Landing

T/O: Approx 1 hr in Landing: Approx 4h30

Perhaps his friend is doing this? Not saying that is excusable but it has happened before... Back on topic. The take off was beautiful. Cannot wait to fly on the A350

He was an alternate account for Erik_Winter I believe.

As long as it is not integrated then it should be fine for the 787.