Jump to content

wiloghby

Members
  • Content Count

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

12 Good

About wiloghby

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

1,821 profile views
  1. Yes, this is the normal and correct modeling. The APU receives fuel from the left tanks. If you can still operate the pumps from the hot battery bus, you can open the crossfeed valves and pump fuel from the center to the left tank to get the APU started In your case where the situation has unfolded while unmonitored, your best bet is to look for a good spot to put the plane down Please read this page at the very least before proceeding: http://www.b737.org.uk/fuel.htm
  2. With some limited experience in development, this approach makes perfect sense...and also explains why you have a legacy of best-in-class X-Plane products attached to your name going back longer than most of us have been old enough to buy beer. If I could offer your newest outfit, IXEG, one constructive suggestion, it would be to have a larger and longer beta period. I know the population of users who know the plane well enough to avoid giving spurious bug reports, while at the same time deviate from normal operating procedures enough to find new ways to break your plane, is not huge. B
  3. At least regarding the above item: This may not be the solution you want, but you can set the maximum bank angle by clicking the square/diamond shaped knob directly behind the heading knob. Full right is 30 degees maximum, Full left is 10 degrees I believe. And the lines each demarcate 5 degree increments between those two extremes. So if you want a smooth turn, you can pull back the max bank from 30 degrees to 20 degrees or so and you should notice a real difference.
  4. Amazing! I might have to steal your flight plan instead of my original one. I'll definitely be doing a lot of SWA and Alaska Airlines though......it's so frustrating I can never fly any of their routes in X-Plane! The IXEG 733 will change all of that...
  5. This has been done with UFMC and X-FMC. And anyone who relies on using these implementations instead of the appropriate, specific flight management system for whatever plane they are flying knows how unsatisfying it is. At the end of the day, someone has to put in the work to model the automation in each plane accurately if they want to charge $50 or $60 for a plane. BUT, if you are a developer, your best bet to cash in is to pick a plane that is so old it doesn't have an FMS in the first place so you don't have to bother, and then claim a perfect systems simulation just 1 or 2 years la
  6. This is really incredible! I would love to see a daytime flight just to get a better idea of what your setup looks like. I wish I had the space, time, and money to make something like this happen.
  7. Somewhat off topic, but the latest beta (2.6b4) for the jar a320 and the last update to the jar a330 do direct waypoints quite well, without totally wonking out like they used to. JAR kept his word about using the a330 development to fix the a320. They ultimately went the other route vs IXEG...released a half-baked product in 2 years and spent 2 years fixing it. I fly both planes now with great regularity without issues... But that's ONLY because I don't have the IXEG 737 to fly yet. Once it is released, I won't even remember who or what a JAR is. FBW is a lot better on both models than
  8. For a team's first product that is now at least 5 years in development? If they take pre-orders it might NEVER be released. For the consumer, this sounds like a nightmare scenario for taking pre-orders. I think a way more prudent thing to do, given that the plane is clearly in a state which is functional and better than most planes in their released v1.0 form, is to set an internal "latest possible" deadline to release the plane such that the project stays within its latest budget, with the understanding that the sale proceeds would allow them to continue developing and releasing updates.
  9. As I've said in previous posts... your attention to detail is unparalleled in X-Plane sim development! In particular I love how exacting Jan has been in requiring the plane to feel right...the image you posted of the aircraft ground lighting looks SO fantastic in terms of the angle and intensity of each of the lights. I can see why it takes a while to develop.
  10. Based on the in-flight demos, this product looks like it was produced with an obsessive attention to detail... ...and as such it should come as a surprise to no one that we now celebrate 1 month since the announcement of "release is getting close" You may be feeling anxious. Just take deep breaths and remind yourself that release must now be getting "REALLY close". In the mean time: What route/plan (aside from any tutorial flight in the documentation/videos) are you going to attempt first once the 737 Classic is released? For me, I'm going to try to program in 2 routes from th
  11. Awesome... I would love a study sim quality Airbus in X-Plane...certainly we do not have that now despite some very good offerings that are almost there. The IXEG 737 Classic is the hands down best candidate to be the first study level modern airliner sim in X-Plane, IMHO. And trust me...I own all of the other contenders that have already been released. Much of the FBW and flight characteristics you would expect to take over near the edge of the flight envelope just aren't there in many of these sims... of course FBW is not really applicable to the Boeing 733, but otherwise from the blog po
×
×
  • Create New...