mjrhealth
-
Posts
590 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Latest X-Plane & Community News
Events
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by mjrhealth
-
May well be teh AMD drivers they never very good.
-
As i posted AA is the issue, if these are doing multiple levels it could be why the hit is bigger than the freeware as I think (could be wrong) they only do one. intruiged..
-
Definitely AA dropped it 2 notches 2 Xfaa+ and im getting 60 fps, cant go any lower my shadows playup
-
There are freeware volumetric clouds and the ydo cause a hit, using this version gave me some of my FPS back till it was broke, But they will fix the issue, But than I only run 1080, have no reason to go higher, as was put to you every thing comes at a cost, you want pretty some thing has to go.
-
@Cameron installed, going for bike ride before gets to hot, let you know how it goes. Thanks for all the good work
-
Oh ok didnt know there was one I will let you know. Cheers
-
Not sure but im running same flight, see how it goes today. It was at sunrise but 5.01 had no issues at all.
-
The funny thing om 5.01 same flight had no FPS hit at all, even V5.0 was fine
-
Not sure what happened could be a driver update but last version of SMP killed my FPS was down as low as 15 above , 20 when in clouds. Previous version was fine in the 30s. Ill have another go when its cooler and see what happens Log.txt
-
Do you have xsaitek panels plugin installed
-
I went to a 2070 from a 1070, wasnt expecting much but I pretty much run AA 1 notch below max, these clouds do make your card work hard thats for sure.
-
I am running XPrealistic and its working fine, getting 37 FPS but thats only because the 170 FMS steals 15 of them
-
There is a link on th xsaitek panels download site youll find one there https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/files/category/182-xsaitekpanel-configurations/
-
Yes i have posted pic showing frame rates further back be interesting to compare. Actually do cause minor stutters when panning outside with wall to wall clouds but ok inside, really puts a load on GPU. Hopefully these will be more fps friendly.
-
I just went from 1070 to 2070 there helped me run AA at higher setting maybe a 5 fps gain, 1070 should be fine but more like 50 FPS. but than anything above 30 is fine as far as I can see.
-
If its more efficient than what I use at present it will be good, it very GPU intensive, not RAM but performance wise.
-
This is SkyMaxx v4 with 10700K RTX 2070, plane MCDU gives me only a 7 FPS hit and I have horizon to horizon freeware volumetric clouds. 38FPS
-
Thanks for this, looking forward, Ive being using this with the freeware volumetric clouds but there is a FPS hit when you have clouds as far as teh eye can see, but it does look good, and thats on a RTX 2070 and 10700K not overclocked better than 30 fps but thats with a plane already giving me a 10 fps hit. Be interesting to compare results. Hope there will be a reminder email go around. Cheers
-
No Precipitation change on SkyMaxx menu 11.50r2 (solved)
mjrhealth replied to VasilisMaximos's topic in SkyMaxx Pro v4
Its probably not s simple, sounds liek someone has to find a new way to draw rain. Vulcan is good but had introduced some texture issues than need to ne sorted.not just rain. -
Its free so be happy and it has come a long way, And FPS hit isnt that big, new thing will take time to optimize.
-
There is a freeware one that works quiet fine with this, only real issue they having is AA when in the clouds, its come a long way
-
Another MS update another reactivation. FYI
-
bugger ye many seem to have run over to teh dark side.
-
Thanks for taking the time looking detailed.
-
Any word on any future updates. Would love to see the Jetstream 32, without the wacky joystick config, only thing that stopped me flying it.
