JGregory

Well, there are some aspects of the brakes that are custom, however, they work fine and should not cause any problems.

Great question!

Not sure what you are referring to as "separate in operation", please clarify.

As was shown above by Cameron, there is an "autostart" option.

No, the camera does not follow the actions. It would be dizzying (and probably not effective) at higher autostart speeds Better that you sit back a little and watch what is happening.

Yes!, a paint kit will be available.

From the OP... "Today we're here to show you a third variant included with the Saab package at no extra charge!"

If you keep talking about Goran that way, he'll never give you a straight answer

Charles, Version 1.5 of the Corvalis (with the FMS fix) is for XP10 only. The problem had to do with the way X-Plane wants the data formatted for the FMS. Unfortunately, there is nothing that can be done to "fix" this problem in XP9. The code for the older versions was done in C++. The code for version 1.5 was completely changed to Gizmo (Lua). They cannot be simply interchanged. If you upgrade to XP10 you will be able to get the current version of the Corvalis (1.5) at NO CHARGE! As a Corvalis customer, you should have gotten a notice of the 1.5 upgrade when it was released. If you want to upgrade and do not have the link, please contact Cameron at X-Aviation and he will get you a link for the download. Jim

Kris, If a person does not have the technical expertise and/or does not understand the product, then they shouldn't be making ANY accusations/statements about that product.

This is inaccurate. Gizmo does NOT interfere with other planes prop discs.

There is absolutely NO REASON that you should have to disable Gizmo and/or reload the sim.

How can you possibly say that pointing the customer to the web page that clearly shows the plane is only 64 bit compatible is "blaming" them? The customer asked why something wasn't working, was told why, and referred to the web page indicating the plane is only 64 bit compatible. Where is the "blame" you speak of?

Since we have not "announced" a day, month, or even a year as to when this will be released, suffering the same fate as the 757 would not be possible.

http://wiki.x-plane.com/Category:Lighting http://wiki.x-plane.com/Custom_Prop_Discs

Does an ERJ-120 even exist?

This issue has been resolved. Fix will be in the next update.

Mario,Did you save the flight plan after you entered it? If so, then that explains why it flew correctly. If not... consider yourself lucky

Mario,This number may vary by a degree due to rounding. If it is larger than that please let me know.

This is all part of the same problem. Try the workaround and your problems should be resolved

If you want to "see" this bug in action then fly the following flight plan: KMRB > MRB > STILL > JOTUP > DANMO > KJYO. This is just an example. The behavior is somewhat unpredictable and inconsistent. This is NOT related to the CDI bug. I will look into this once the other issues are sorted out.

I can now confirm that this is a bug. I have narrowed it down somewhat but it may take some time to completely resolve. Here is a workaround... Create your flight plan as usual. Then save the plan ("SAVE" Key). Initialize the FMS again ("INIT" Key). Load the flight plan ("LOAD" Key) that you saved. Proceed as usual. The Corvalis should follow your flight plan properly.

Pictures would be great... but, more importantly, please provide the exact flight plan with navaids you are using so I can recreate this.

So... at 7:27 you agree with my assessment (posted at 7:09) but still find it necessary to post a video showing the issue that's already been fixed?Am I missing something, or are you just trying to push all our (support) buttons today?

The difference is...when it comes to the Saab... my eight-ball actually does know... while BWolf7 is simply