Cameron

Quick, someone call PMDG and tell them they're doing it wrong!

Thanks!

The only person who brought any mention about perfect is you. Not developers. You may say the Saab is not perfect (somehow HDR is more important than an accurate simulation and design aspect to you). You may say PMDG is not perfect. That's your right, but the important factor in this is: neither of these projects released as you suggest this to. Maybe perfection is not the goal. Completion is, and that's not for you to decide. I think it's time to give this a rest and let the topic do what it's intended to.

It's not happening, and that's the final answer.

As someone who deals with more customers and users than most anyone in the market, I know you're wrong. I'll give you my take on JAR: it was a disaster. It's probably the one release I saw consistent user dissatisfaction with. Thankfully the developer has stuck with it and improved. The Saab is a perfect example of doing it right wins. There was lots of praise and appreciation when we announced delays in order to not sell customers short. If people go back to MSFS that's okay. They can always come back, and often times they do!

I don't think it's Tom's job to argue JAR's reputation. Whether you agree or not, Tom gave you an answer, and one I entirely agree with. First impression is everything, and what they are doing appears nothing short of amazing. Hats off to IXEG!

Doing this becomes rather complicated due to each person having different screen resolutions. It would require code that would be not only complex, but wasteful because it would run every flight loop. In short, the answer is 'no' for now. No, there is not.

AF, Jim's point is valid but my automatic assumption is that you used HDR. Is that not the case?

Just to let you know, these have not been forgotten. I know this topic has sat here for a bit!

That's not reason to reply at all. It's childish in fact, and you contributed absolutely nothing constructive in here. Don't do it again. As a grown man, I'm sure you're capable of leaving that childish baggage at the door. You're the only one in here with a locked thread in the entire Saab forum; go figure. Hopefully that starts now. Don't bother replying to this.

No I'm talking about assigning the condition levers to my joystick. Didn't want to start a new post because this problem has been reported already.The assigning function to the 2 condition levers is done successfully ( the plugin says ASSIGNED) but one of the lever doesn't move when I move the lever on my throttle quadrant. Ah, yes, then this is no worry as it is already fixed for the upcoming update.

I read elsewhere (I think Avsim) that he actually suggests the NOAA plugin for this product over the standard X-Plane weather configuration for a number of reasons. I really ought to try that NOAA script out. Heard a lot of good things on it.

Was this topic ever about other aircraft? Go start another thread in another forum if you want to truly discuss such a thing.

John's answered this one before. The answer is yes.

I think the issue here simply becomes one of fill rate, where you're pushing the limit so high against that limit that the difference between the two still pushes the card to its limit and thus the difference is negligible. It's similar to the effect of having a 4GB video card, installing 2GB of textures, then uninstalling the 2GB of textures and replacing them with 1GB worth of textures. Because you have so much overhead still available in this scenario, you will see no increase in FPS. The difference here is we're talking about geometry and how it's rendered in HDR.

Yes, it does. You have no idea what you're talking about. You don't have the Saab, but to appease you, I just loaded it up with the exact settings you specified. The props do not rotate. Please do not go telling people to do adjustments on a product that: A.) You don't even own to know that what you're saying is even the issue B.) Is heavily customized and programmed to mimic the real deal The props spin in the wind, just as they would in real life. There is no prop brake on the A, and as has been mentioned by Dhruv here who worked in the real world with the B (which does have a prop brake), even those would spin in windy conditions.

It has everything to do with the wind...if the wind is not present, the props do not rotate. Messing with ANYTHING to do with engines on this aircraft will void your support AND cause you MAJOR issues. We entirely override every aspect of the engine model in X-Plane to properly simulate the CT7.

Please realize that if you are having a manipulator grabbing issue where the lever will not move when you grab it, this is due to your camera angle (as has been discussed here) and X-Plane not being able to realize what way to go. There is nothing we can do to fix this. Laminar has had it this way since X-Plane 9.

Can you please confirm that you did a generator reset PRIOR to your flight starting to begin with?

Looking further at your images, your CRS arrow is pointed pretty much 180 degrees behind you. Did you forget to adjust this correctly?

Thanks for the compliment, sir!

We may change that in the long run, but for now all documents with the exception of charts are searchable. Let us know if you need help finding any others and we'll certainly be happy to help.

Okay, let us know if you need help! Yes, you're right, it was here. I hadn't heard other reports on it, but being we now have two it's time to start looking harder into it!

So to be clear, you are experiencing the issue between YCF and YYZ? What I see in your screenshot is that the VOR is not captured, so the AP doesn't seem to know where to go. The most logical reason for this to happen would be distance from the VOR not being close enough. Can you confirm this screenshot is taken at the time you experience the issue? I'll be happy to look into this for you!

Anything in particular we can assist you with, or are you just looking to explore for the time being? Thanks for the task manager trackings. For the moment nothing pops off in my head as "aha", but we definitely need to investigate this.