Cameron

They are visual. Remove them like you should. We don't plan to simulate something you should take care of when you know you should.

Uh, what? That's not what's in the screenshots.

Read the posts before yours.

Also see this thread of a similar issue on the 777.

You'll need to consult Linux users on this one. Apparently the community for it is very helpful. Here's your problem: dlerror:libGLEW.so.1.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

No. The particles are smart enough to do what you want it to. No extra effort or programming necessary, John. It's an added bonus....non-advertised!

Because you used laundry detergent and forgot the fabric softener.

Cruster, I'm really unclear what you want at this point. I don't understand why you continue to post info you know has no relevancy to us unless you answer questions as asked of you in post #2. Otherwise, there's nothing to say here. You may want to post your crash log as well.

Looks correct. I imagine XSB is feeding it some mixed layers, which is not the nicest, but that's what it wants.

Nope, it's just a massive amount of textures that cover a small area, thus using up quite a bit more VRAM than your typical add-on. It helps that they are good texture artists, but my first point is the primary answer that you're after. Where a typical plane can be textured on a single UV map, McPhat will split it up into multiple.

He labeled it as a joke. Perhaps you missed that part where he said "kidding aside." In any case, thanks for sharing your perspective and thoughts! You are certainly entitled to your opinion, and I hope that airing your frustration has made you feel better. If you feel your time was put to good use, then that's okay in the end and I have no objection to it. I still firmly believe it's counter productive, that we all could have found something better to do than have an exchange of words that do nothing, but if it was felt as a positive step in your daily activities, I am not going to stop you.

Glad to hear of a fix! Direct link to topic is here.

Enough, Gentlemen. It's out when it's out. This is entirely counter-productive not only for us, but for you too. There are many better things we could ALL be doing with our lives than actually trying to hash out words here.

Pretty sure the 777 uses SASL. Rather than it being a SASL issue, I think this is an A320 NEO specific issue where the developer needs to chime in and explain what he's doing with weather datarefs. I wouldn't be so quick to blame SASL as a whole.

So why don't you just switch to a different sky color? It's a matter of preference. Don't like it? Change it!

I won't even begin to have a debate about complexities with you. Nine words in to your post and I knew you can't even begin to relate. Believe what you wish and how you wish. Congrats to the SSG team!

Please read the replies above yours. Thanks (although the server shows you already just activated)!

All license request must be handled through email.

I have just uploaded a new version of the installer which should fix this issue. There will be no e-mails sent out for this as it doesn't seem to affect a mass amount of people, but for those who do experience it, please follow the instructions as outlined in the update topic to grab the latest installer and re-install!

Elaborate. That's not very useful.

We are still working out the best way to handle this. So far it's proving to not be an easy task.

The glazing is purposefully out of position.

All license related issues must be sent in by email to X-Aviation. We do not handle these on the forums.

I agree that with a 780 you should not be having any crazy issues. This isn't a big multi monitor setup, is it? We'll keep looking into this, but I'm not sure how far we will get. One idea (if you have time) is to remove all plugins except Gizmo, Silverlining, and XSB and see if the problem persists. You also mention SASL. That should not be in your plugins folder if if is.