Cameron

Sorry, but not possible. All the RealScenery installer does is unzip downloaded files and nothing more. Within those downloads is strictly the scenery, and as you can see in this forum, this is far from a redundant issue. Based on your assessment, it's quite clear that M54 is your issue, and you are likely missing a required library for it. Which one, I do not know. Facades are primarily used for objects or simple buildings, both of which are non-existent in the dsf "code" of RealScenery. It's quite literally impossible, and even further exemplified by the fact that removal of just that one scenery of all the others you have allow RealScenery to run just fine.

We don't place objects in this scenery, so there's got to be a little more at play here. 1. Can you please share which version of X-Plane you have installed? 2. Aside from RealScenery, do you have any other object scenery for any airports or even OSM data you have downloaded to complement it?

I actually don't. Do a search of OSM2XP and ask the webmaster there.

Nope, that is an Enhanced product. It works plenty fine there if you do the overlays correctly. Benny from OSM2XP even had a building set for this.

That's definitely not default data if buildings are correctly placed. It's someone's custom osm data (or possibly ONLY road default data) in an overlay dsf loaded (by load order) on top of Florida.

For legacy products like the one shown there you would need to first remove the already included overlays (XP 9 style). Unknown.

No, this is not possible without a lot of reverse engineering.

It's been done many times already and screenshots are floating around about it. The only reason I could see it not working would be due to load order settings. Even in internal tests we have had this work without a hitch. It's definitely not rocket science.

You're in the right spot.

Render engines have little meaning to X-Plane. The sim is what counts.

Still happening. The difference there was rather than the iPad app the actual system is able to almost autoland the aircraft.

At the request of user 'LA', the conversation between he and myself have been removed from this topic.

Gizmo is not traditionally known to have much of any performance impact on systems. It's been around for years. Yes, you will eventually have issues with it disabled and we don't suggest doing so. As this question has now been answered this topic will now be closed.

Here: http://www.classicjetsims.com/WorldTraffic/updates.html

Why don't you try their free evaluation and see for yourself how the performance is on your machine?

Not at this time.

We're still working with Laminar on some bugs.

Hi, Steve, Please see the reply to your support e-mail you also sent in!

Looks great, Pete! Keep it up!

Congrats on an awesome looking project, Parsec!

Because the Falco plugin is not 64-bit.

No, you were banned here for your rude attitude and constant cussing. Your virtual airline never had anything to do with it. Enough.

What happens if you roll back your drivers?

Sure...find a Saab 340A manual and start reading. In all seriousness, though...there's way too much to list. I think the best way will be through video or the manual we provide itself. As we have previously indicated, this product is intended to be study level and mimics the real world aircraft systems. There are no generic displays or autopilot functionality here. We'll definitely post more on this, as it's a very important part of this product.

I wouldn't be so sure, and I'm quite confident the market is plenty there to make suitable profit on these two products. Don't sale such aircraft short...trust me. It's further amplified by an already existing reputation as well.