Cameron

I guess that means you didn't read anything in the big red text after you submitted your support ticket on X-Aviation. It reads as follows: A support ticket has been created and a copy of it with your support ticket number has been sent to your e-mail on file. If you send multiple e-mails this will delay our response to you. Do not do this! Typical response time is 3 days or less.

I wouldn't be so sure. If there's one thing Tom likes it's beer!

It works on Mac. Just so happens their manual was Windows minded.

Can you expand on why?

Nope. Time for you to submit a support ticket I guess. You're 100% trying to run a 32-bit version, which means whatever you're installing is not the latest (should be 1.5.3).

Try not to say the same thing about Navigraph! He'd go Aerosoft...because he already does.

Hi Rydent1, I think it's certain we'll ultimately do such a thing. The sounds for this product are astonishingly good. Yes, the sounds are all recorded (including interior/switch sounds) from the real aircraft thanks to access provided by a certain airline.

And that makes sense since it's a SkyMaxx feature to give you such a warning! You didn't really answer Frank's question at all.

Ultimately the choice is yours. Now you have answers as to where things currently stand with the product and you can adjust your thoughts accordingly. If your purchase comes down to an AIRAC cycle and who is providing that data then so be it! Perhaps one day both will be supported. For now (and likely at release), such is not the case.

Folks, as stated, Aerosoft supports essentially all formats as far as I can tell. This may ultimately mean you stop subscribing to one and move to the other. Their supported list includes: Aerosoft Airbus A318 / A319 Aerosoft AirbusX Extended/Standard (FSX; Prepar3D) FlightSim Commander (FSX; Prepar3D) FS Navigator (FS2004) aeroSystem 737 Avionics AivlaSoft Electronic Flight Bag (FSX/Prepa3d v2) CaptainSim 757/767 (FSX; Prepar3D; FS2004) Digital Aviation Piper Cheyenne (FSX; Prepar3D; FS2004) Eurowings Professional (FS2004) EADT KLN 90B (X-Plane) Eaglesoft Cessna Citation (FSX; Prepar3D; FS2004) Flight1 ATR 72, BN2-Islander, C182T, Fokker, Mustang, Super 80 Professional (FSX; Prepar3D; FS2004) FSBuild 2.4 FsXPand - Flyware (FSX; Prepar3D; FS2004) iFly Boeing 737 (FSX; Prepar3D; FS2004) Integrated Simavionics (FSX; Prepar3D; FS2004) JRollon Planes CRJ200 (X-Plane) Level-D 767 (FSX; Prepar3D; FS2004) Majestic Dash 8 Q400 (FSX/Prepa3d/Prepa3d v2) PMDG alle Produkte (FSX; Prepar3D; FS2004) Pointsoft PRO-ATC/X Prosim 737 PSS Boeing 777; A330; A340 (FS2004) QualityWings 757 (FSX; Prepar3D; FS2004) QualityWings Jumbolino (FSX; Prepar3D; FS2004) Sim-Avionics Flightdeck Avionics TuneVNAV Descent Pro3 vasFMC X-FMC (X-Plane) Wilco/Feelthere 737/777 Airbus, Citation X, Embraer E-Jets v.2, Legacy (FSX; Prepar3D; FS2004) Ideal Flight 10 777 Worldliner Professional/Extended (X-Plane) Boeing 757 Professional (X-Plane) JARDesign A320neo (X-Plane) JeeHellWare FJCC Universal FMC (X-Plane) SSG B748-i Global ATC Simcheck A300 FMC (FSX) EFASS - Electronic Flight Assistant Professional Flight Planner X X-Plane 10 (V 10.00 - 10.xx) GNS430 (X-Plane 10.30) SimLauncherX @mgeiss the format is already a mix of two existing formats. Navigraph still does not work at this time.

So here's where we stand: As mentioned, in previous time we have tested Navigraph data over Aerosoft. The result was Aersoft data rendered more accurate to how one would expect in drawing routes. Aerosoft has been very communicative when approached by anyone. Navigraph has been known to leave developers hanging for months without answering to get a new format up. IXEG has had previous attempts to talk to them, and I distinctly remember having a similar "mini crisis" back when the CRJ was released where they also failed to respond for weeks to months on end. We have to go with where communication is welcome, responded to, and the provided data accurately depicts what should be seen on the displays. You would THINK the data would be identical, but for whatever reason it is not, and I do even remember Philipp of Flight Factor and the CRJ touching up on this very subject at one time. If I have to be completely honest, I think we're going to end up with Aerosoft out the gate. Perhaps we can attempt to look at flexibility down the line, but one thing we don't have is time or patience to wait for a company like Navigraph to not respond to our inquiries and ultimately hold up a release. That's bad news for all. Anyways, thanks for the "votes" here guys. I get where you're coming from. I was a Navigraph guy myself for years.

Have you checked to see if those same products are already supported by Aerosoft? My bet is they are! When the team did early route draw testing Aerosoft seemed to outperform navigraph data in accurate drawing and data location. It's part of the motivation to move that way.

Remains to be seen. Somewhere along the line they change formatting and it does not play well with the 737, so for now that answer is no. Aerosoft has been the choice now for a while and that continues to work swell. I'd love to hear opinions on this though!

Did you at one time request that you get access to 32-bit as a download?

Ben already told you...you're trying to load a 32-bit product in 64-bit. That won't work. You need to re-download the latest version of the CRJ.

That is correct!

Hi there, The AIRAC will be whatever we are allowed to ship with by Aerosoft NavDataPro (it seems that will be the format of choice). There is no set in stone position on this, so take this as "in development" information at this time.

Please see the answer which was provided to you via e-mail.

2GB of vram is borderline very small these days. I'm not surprised of this in the least! On a 27 inch display, for example, X-Plane will eat that for lunch without much of any modification.

It has been tested in 10.11.1 and is working wonderfully.

2020...that makes me want to cry just thinking about it.

No sir.

You can just unsubscribe. And no, each week it doesn't say 39 days. It shows less and less days each time. It's not an ad so much as a reminder. Once it's December 23rd your window of opportunity is over. Case closed.

The view UI simply takes you to the specified area clicked. For instance, clicking FMC zooms you into FMC. There's no "realistic" zoom level for something of that nature. That said, FOV changes greatly based on one's monitor ratio and size. You can customize this in the GUI or via X-Plane rendering settings.

Diego, At some point more time will be dedicated to showing some liveries, including how many. There's quite a number already thanks to Morten, but we'll save that for a later discussion.