Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/06/2011 in all areas

  1. Who said only Javier is allowed to post work-in-progress shots? This is fresh from the avionics bay: Question: How many differences from the current FMS can you spot? Enjoy! Philipp
    1 point
  2. My expectations are very reasonable. Simply stated: - 19/20 FPS is a poor experience. You should be flying at min. of 30 FPS. - I will not go into specific graphics settings that I have set (tuned based on my hardware; set just below average, no HDR) the sim under-performs on my machine (ATI 5870, overclocked i920 3.8 GHz, 6 GB of RAM, Win 7-64 bit, running of SSD - solid state drive, defintely a higher end system). The sim barely renders 15 FPS, avg 13 FPS. I`d like to mention that yes I am running at 3870x1050 and that`s why I have ATI card because it handles well high res. In window mode (1650x1050) I can hit 20-25 FPS, that`s still below the bare minimum. Main reason why I went with X-Plane 9 originally because of its good frame rates. X-Plane 10 tuned down may even look worse than X-Plane 9 with lower frame rates.
    1 point
  3. Oh yes, I was imagining flying that little darling along the coast and valleys of BC and Alaska. Sorry for that! Well, it is weekend and I thought you might wanna see the neutral colour base exterior with normal and spec maps added to it. Livery painting starts soon, and this is the neural colour base you will get, in order for you to create your favorite paintjob. Hope you enjoy!
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...