Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/29/2011 in all areas

  1. I think it does make sense for it not to be fixed. Javier is a busy person. He has to churn out consumer-grade default planes on a deadline, support his planes already on the market, and deal with people like you. While his decision not to go back and fix the hump so that the 1% of people who will both notice it and actually buy the sim will be satisfied may not make sense to that 1%, to the rest of the market it makes more sense to concentrate on things that they actually feel are relevant, such as optimization, better weather, better ATC, and better autogen. Basically what I'm saying is that nobody cares. I see the difference in the humps, yet I don't care. Why not? Because the default 747 runs at 12 FPS for me with rendering options set to the bare minimum. Would I like to see the hump fixed? You bet. Am I going to care? No, because as it stands I can't even run the damn thing on my computer. The hump is not a deal breaker for most people. When you consider the fact that Leading Edge will be releasing a state-of-the-art 747-400 within the next year or so that will more than adequately satisfy the needs of even the most rabid rivet counter, the issue at hand becomes even more irrelevant and ridiculous.
    1 point
  2. Hi folks, just read great news from Torsten:
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...