pryoski Posted March 9, 2013 Report Posted March 9, 2013 (edited) Just curious, because up till now I've not really bothered with it. Today I've turned it on but it still seems to make my MFD's (and the display on the FMC) just go dark regardless of the plane I'm flying ... I'm running XP 10.20 (stable). In case it's an issue with my card, I've got AMD Radeon 7800 series card and running the latest Catalyst 13.1 drivers (stable). I've tried searching on this but the HDR thing doesn't appear to be current anymore ... any input/ideas greatly appreciated! The Edit ... probably should've reworded the subject as "Is HDR rendering in XP still an issue for some?" Edited March 9, 2013 by Kris Pryo Quote
chris k Posted March 9, 2013 Report Posted March 9, 2013 Not for most anymore. Many of the aircraft vendors have worked with LR/Ben on this over the past 6 months, and they've got the lighting issues mainly covered these days. They would be in the minority if there is. However, In terms of rendering speeds: 4x SSAA + FXAA is actually now FASTER than non-HDR Mode. i.e. I get consistently better FPS++ in HDR mode vs Non-HDR. Ben's been doing some fantastic optimizations in this area. I'm now using HDR mode exclusively. - CK. 2 Quote
Benedikt S. Posted March 9, 2013 Report Posted March 9, 2013 Not for most anymore. Many of the aircraft vendors have worked with LR/Ben on this over the past 6 months, and they've got the lighting issues mainly covered these days. They would be in the minority if there is. However, In terms of rendering speeds: 4x SSAA + FXAA is actually now FASTER than non-HDR Mode. i.e. I get consistently better FPS++ in HDR mode vs Non-HDR. Ben's been doing some fantastic optimizations in this area. I'm now using HDR mode exclusively. - CK. Huh, i'm getting without HDR nice 25FPS, with 4x SSAA + FXAA 3 fps.... Quote
chris k Posted March 9, 2013 Report Posted March 9, 2013 Got a DX11-level card? i.e. Fermi, Tahiti, Kepler, etc.. chipsets, Quote
pryoski Posted March 9, 2013 Author Report Posted March 9, 2013 (edited) Thnx for the information Chris ... (have I told you I love your work? I love your work man! YSSY and YPAD are glorious and REALLY come to life with HDR). I am running 4x SSAA + FXAA and love the atmosphere, but looking at the issue more carefully I notice that the anomaly for me happens on the FMC screens of some aircraft (I know I initially said all .. that's incorrect). Specifically it looks like an old VT100 style terminal that's lost it's sharpness and clarity ... or like an LCD screen that's been damaged so that the characters are incomplete and unreadable. It happens for both 64bit and 32bit modes). The aircraft I have noticed this effect is on the JARDesign A320neo (all MFD's & FMC screens), the default KingAir C90 (FMC screen only) and the FlyJSim Q400 (FMC screen only). The EDIT: Also on the FlyJSim 727-200F (love this aircraft) it affects the green LED that let's you know at a glance which COM/NAV radio is active ... Cheers! Edited March 9, 2013 by Kris Pryo Quote
Femke Posted April 8, 2013 Report Posted April 8, 2013 (edited) Seems to be affecting the Bombardier Challenger 300 Captain Edition Just curious, because up till now I've not really bothered with it. Today I've turned it on but it still seems to make my MFD's (and the display on the FMC) just go dark regardless of the plane I'm flying ... I'm running XP 10.20 (stable). In case it's an issue with my card, I've got AMD Radeon 7800 series card and running the latest Catalyst 13.1 drivers (stable). I've tried searching on this but the HDR thing doesn't appear to be current anymore ... any input/ideas greatly appreciated! The Edit ... probably should've reworded the subject as "Is HDR rendering in XP still an issue for some?" Seems to be affecting the Bombardier Challenger 300 Captain Edition in a similar way. The green information digits disappear as does the background colour of the PFD display whenever HDR is enabled.In 64 bit since the new SASL 64bit plugin was updated a couple of weeks back that is, as regards 32bit the same problems apply.It isn't intermittent either it is every time HDR is enabled. Sigh! This was the only one of my top rated payware planes that was flying without problems. Think I will go sob quietly in a corner. Edited April 8, 2013 by Femke 1 Quote
woweezowee Posted April 8, 2013 Report Posted April 8, 2013 I don't bother with it anymore; performance with my ATI5870 is just too low with HDR enabled. 1 Quote
pryoski Posted April 8, 2013 Author Report Posted April 8, 2013 (edited) I think it's my monitor .. it's an old resuscitated 19" monitor that was getting thrown away @ work .. guess I'll bite the bullet and get a decent one that will do justice to the rest of my rig; which considering it's not the bee's knees is still not too shabby ... lol! Hells bells I might even splurge and get myself three hehe! Edited April 8, 2013 by Kris Pryo Quote
Benedikt S. Posted April 8, 2013 Report Posted April 8, 2013 Got a DX11-level card? i.e. Fermi, Tahiti, Kepler, etc.. chipsets, I don't need this Card... i have the best GPU forever, you don't need any NVIDIA or AMD GPU's. With the Ultimative Intel HD Graphics 3000!!!! With imense 512 MB VRAM! ( i hope, you see, that this is Ironic) 1 Quote
OlaHaldor Posted April 8, 2013 Report Posted April 8, 2013 (edited) I just tested with and without HDR. I flew the Duchess from KSEA for about 1min 30 sek. Then I went to replay mode, and benchmarked the replay as it was playing 60 seconds of it. Each time from the same point of time. I did nothing to manipulate the view, it was 3D cockpit and looking forward. Here's my findings. HDR OFF - 4x antialiasingFrames: 1759 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 29.317 - Min: 24 - Max: 33 HDR ON - 2x SSAA + FXAAFrames: 1575 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 26.250 - Min: 24 - Max: 29 HDR ON - 4x SSAA + FXAAFrames: 1293 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 21.550 - Min: 19 - Max: 24 Tested with these settings. Only HDR/antilaiasing were changed. 1920x1080 windowed mode. Edited April 8, 2013 by OlaHaldor Quote
john82088 Posted April 8, 2013 Report Posted April 8, 2013 Very helpful! Thanks. That helped answer a question I had. Quote
Ntr09 Posted April 8, 2013 Report Posted April 8, 2013 Oddly, HDR 4xAA doesn't seem to affect my system noticeably. Much more enjoyable with it on anyway. I'd sacrifice other settings before I turned HDR off. -NR Quote
OlaHaldor Posted April 8, 2013 Report Posted April 8, 2013 So, you're flying with 4x SSAA? Gotta test that then. Quote
FloB Posted April 9, 2013 Report Posted April 9, 2013 (edited) Not for most anymore. Many of the aircraft vendors have worked with LR/Ben on this over the past 6 months, and they've got the lighting issues mainly covered these days. They would be in the minority if there is. However, In terms of rendering speeds: 4x SSAA + FXAA is actually now FASTER than non-HDR Mode. i.e. I get consistently better FPS++ in HDR mode vs Non-HDR. Ben's been doing some fantastic optimizations in this area. I'm now using HDR mode exclusively. - CK. Are you serious? I find it hard to believe because 4xSSAA gives a huge performance hit by nature and I don't know what Laminar could do to make it faster than 4xMSAA. It might related to your specific system. Performance for HDR / non HDR on my system (GTX670-2GB, 2600k) is about the same as ola's and for me it's still an issue because even FXAAx4SSAA (which is expensive performance-wise) produces more shimmering at daytime and dusk/dawn than 4xMSAA. As Ben said, there are hopes that someone comes up with a new and fast solution for a high quality AA for HDR. But that is not for sure and it will take some time. TXAA is not very good either at this time. RegardsFlo Edited April 10, 2013 by FloB Quote
OlaHaldor Posted April 9, 2013 Report Posted April 9, 2013 Ola: were you flying with no AA? -NRMy answer is right here. When I tested without HDR, I used 4x AA. The rest is mentioned in that post as well. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.