Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi all

I wrote a small LUA script to fly a hold starting at any chosen point. As you can see in the picture, it already works quite well. I haven’t compensated for wind drift yet, therefore there still may be a shift. In my script, I specify the heading of the leg as well as its duration in seconds. I set the bank angle to 25 degrees. The speed is manually set to 215 knots, and I define whether the turn should be to the right or to the left. In principle I allow any reasonable altitude and of course altitude changes.

The picture also shows a defined hold nearby, which seems to have a different size. Less bank angle ? Higher velocity ?

So I would like to ask, what instructions does ATC issue when they clear an aircraft to hold ?

And, by the way, does someone know how to write with LUA directly into the FMC scratchpad without "typing" every character via the keyboard.

Thanks a lot :) 

25-12-03-HOLD-ALPHA.png

Edited by FlyerC3
Posted

Nice work!

Normally ATC will clear you for "published holds" - or they give you holding instructions consisting of a fix, an inbound course and a timing (how long in flighttime the inbound leg should be).

Posted (edited)

 

Is there a fix entry point for the HOLD, i.e. as shown here always LETKU ? Or can I enter the ring any place convenient for my situation ?

image.png.d72c121c10d2145f7f464bdbf6e9ee50.png

And what about the turn radius, i.e. is it a venial sin to overshoot when speed is to high ?

And one more : I assume,the FIX is alway the begin or end of the leg ?

 

Edited by FlyerC3
Posted (edited)

@Jan Thank you for the link. I assume IRL the pilot first manually goes into the circle due to the existing rules and then relies to the automatic  ?  With my 733 I joined "somehow" the circle and used timer and heading mode, but that keeps me quite busy especially when there are still other things to do during descend, since mostly the hold gives me additional miles when I was late for descend for the one or the other reason :)

@mjrhealth : no, I am using SI because of the very good voice interface, the astonishing AI model behind and the availability, that VATSIM et al. cannot match

Edited by FlyerC3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...