Matchstick Posted April 13, 2023 Report Posted April 13, 2023 (edited) Just installing the updated version of the RSG G5 avionics and it got me wondering if there's any chance of a version somewhere down the line of the Mu-2 with support for this for people who want a bit of glass in the cockpit but don't want to go full G500 ? Edited April 13, 2023 by Matchstick Quote
tkyler Posted April 13, 2023 Report Posted April 13, 2023 (edited) I might could make that work. I see no technical reasons why not....just the development time. I'll keep it in the back of my mind as a work and if a time opportunity presents itself, I'll see about squeezing it in. If Garmin can design it to 'be an easy swap' with existing instruments....should be the same for me -tkyler Edited April 13, 2023 by tkyler Quote
Cameron Posted April 13, 2023 Report Posted April 13, 2023 While it could be done, I'll add that the G5 is not certified for such an aircraft type. It's intended and certified for small piston aircraft. Quote
Matchstick Posted April 13, 2023 Author Report Posted April 13, 2023 This is flight simming- I suspect 90% of what we do would be frowned up by one regulatory body or another Quote
Cameron Posted April 13, 2023 Report Posted April 13, 2023 3 minutes ago, Matchstick said: This is flight simming- I suspect 90% of what we do would be frowned up by one regulatory body or another There's honestly a lot of pride in what we do in development by matching what's in the real world. What you do as a simmer is on you though. As developers, we don't try to stray far away from reality since that's actually what most of the consumer market does desire. Of course, that varies by developer on some other stores though. 1 Quote
Matchstick Posted April 13, 2023 Author Report Posted April 13, 2023 3 minutes ago, Cameron said: There's honestly a lot of pride in what we do in development by matching what's in the real world. What you do as a simmer is on you though. As developers, we don't try to stray far away from reality since that's actually what most of the consumer market does desire. Of course, that varies by developer on some other stores though. I can definitely appreciate that with the stock aircraft but I personally lean towards a little more latitude when it comes to optional system and add-ons - allowing people the option to choose to some extent what feels right for them to fly, whether that exactly matches the real world or not Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.