Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi! Thank you for this version of the Mu-2 it is a lot of fun.

I can't find commands in the documentation to bind my hardware to extend and turn on the landing lights? Is this somewhere?

Also I couldn't make my levers (Saitek Quadrant) work for the throttles as throttle1 & throttle2, when I move the levers the plane levers move but there is no effect on the engines. In contrast if I bind a single lever to "throttle" everything works fine.

Cheers,

Luigi

Posted
12 minutes ago, Ch.Cole said:

Check your axis curves, you might need to set the detent in the prefs and the checkbox in the curves.

For the lights, there should be commands, no need for datarefs.

The landing light switches have 3 positions (extent ; off and on).

Posted
Quote

 can't find commands in the documentation to bind my hardware to extend and turn on the landing lights? Is this somewhere?

Convenient...just finished up the landing lights even as I type.  I'll create the commands for those right now.

Regarding the hardware mapping to throttles 1/2.....agree this is fraught with potential pitfalls atm, the next update will map to throttles 3/4 and hopefully solve all your problems.  There has been some "kickback" from some folks about reassigning throttles, but X-Plane (for those unawares) has a great joystick profile mangagement capability for this very reason.  So, you should just be able to assign the throttles once for the MU2 and it will load with the MU2 when you set it up that way.

Posted
Quote

I checked with the Dataref-Tool, and 0 1 2 are correct. Strange it doesn't work...

There were a lot of holes in the landing light controls....I wired them up to their respective busses, including the extension motor..so the whole external lighting just got revamped.   I'm putting in commands for those landing lights now.

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

The default commands don't account for the extension...only the off/on states.  so I'm inclined to go custom all the way, however, I could use the default commands for the OFF/ON and provide custom for the extension?  thoughts?

 

Edited by tkyler
Posted

So I'm thinking the default commands for the OFF and ON..and custom for the extension. Executing the commmands will "move the switches" and the code will run based on switch position (and power states)

Posted
14 minutes ago, tkyler said:

So I'm thinking the default commands for the OFF and ON..and custom for the extension. Executing the commmands will "move the switches" and the code will run based on switch position (and power states)

Is it possible that the overhead is labled strangely? From the sources I have it's from downmost RET - OFF - EXT, while in sim, it's ON - OFF - EXT

Posted (edited)

I would agree with that.  no telling where I got that..probably a photo from someone else's "remodled Moo"....but its that way in the manual for sure.   I'll adjust.  Good catch!

 

But I do find it a bit weird to pull the switches "back" to make the lights "extend forward" :) Gonna get some comments on this I think...but we do have the documentation.

-TomK

Edited by tkyler
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted

so with the relabeling....and now that Im' testing it.  I find it a bit awkward to have an "extension" command.  I'm inclined to use the default commands to "extend and illuminate" and "extinguish and retract"...and just use the mouse manipulator to move the switches to the OFF position, as in my experiences in the Moo..its a pretty rare position to use.  any objections or thoughts?

 

Posted

According to my settings (with the datarefs quoted above), the switches are set to OFF position when the landing lights are 'extinguish and retract". I should have missed something : in upper opsition, the landing lights come extended, right ?

Posted

right.  in the new setup, EXT will basically be ON. "EXTended and illuminated"  OFF (as labled...not the datarefs sense) is extended by not-illuminated. and OFF (in the dataref sense) will align with RET (RETracted and OFF). 

 

Posted

Thank you very much, that will be easy to bind hardware.

Another small thing: Is it possible to ask for commands to set flaps 0,5,20,40 directly? Then using SPAD.next I can map a lever axis and set axis zones for each flap setting and I will be able to change the flaps using a lever instead than clicking buttons to go up or down.

Posted
5 hours ago, lrargerich said:

Thank you very much, that will be easy to bind hardware.

Another small thing: Is it possible to ask for commands to set flaps 0,5,20,40 directly? Then using SPAD.next I can map a lever axis and set axis zones for each flap setting and I will be able to change the flaps using a lever instead than clicking buttons to go up or down.

Until it's implemented, would a lua-script (flywithlua) help?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...