Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So i'm starting my second project, which is about 40 different 787 packages. Each package will contain one livery, with custom interior and exterior fittings. the planes will feature FBW plugins and a full 3d cockpit, along with a full interior and detailed exterior. A video by Ruyjo1 is available on his youtube channel.

post-8539-0-58940800-1346544253_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-47059500-1346544264_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-45807500-1346544272_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-51910400-1346544280_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-25147600-1346544286_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-91354800-1346544296_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-14068700-1346544314_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-70621500-1346544325_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-10224000-1346544337_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-05062400-1346544349_thumb.pn

  • Upvote 7
  • Downvote 1
Posted

Ah, everyones favorite little copyright infringing, IP stealing, problem child is back under another pseudonym. This should be good for a few laughs until Cameron drops the ban hammer down again.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 3
Posted

Announcement! this 787's first release date is now slated for december 2012, with a plugin free version, simulating about 50% of the 787's features. after that, a new, fully simulated version will be released around april with the plugin

  • Upvote 4
Posted

A demonstration of decal usage on the 787, creating hi-definition small parts. This technique is used by some of the greatest designers, including ramzzess, and allows for great, sharp, retina-display level images to be placed on your plane.

post-8539-0-08985900-1347846451_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-99487200-1347846457_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-19107900-1347846464_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-96253500-1347846471_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-67466500-1347846477_thumb.pn

post-8539-0-79748500-1347846485_thumb.pn

Posted

This technique is used by some of the greatest designers, including ramzzess, and allows for great, sharp, retina-display level images to be placed on your plane.

Didn't you just get done on a month long rant about how bad Ramzzess is and how bad the 777 was??

*confused*

  • Upvote 3
Posted

Didn't you just get done on a month long rant about how bad Ramzzess is and how bad the 777 was??

*confused*

He's made it quite clear that he likes Ramzzess, but that he feels the 777 fell short. Praises of the SSJ from Michael are found in many areas of the forum.

Posted

Didn't you just get done on a month long rant about how bad Ramzzess is and how bad the 777 was??

*confused*

that rant was based on exterior deficiency, not technique. Plus this technique i learned from the SSJ, (one of my favorite planes) not the 777.

Posted

He's made it quite clear that he likes Ramzzess, but that he feels the 777 fell short. Praises of the SSJ from Michael are found in many areas of the forum.

Thank you Cameron

Goran, i know you probably don't like me very much, but i kinda get the feeling that you're launching personal attacks on me. please, refrain from doing so, if you have a dispute, i'd be glad to settle it via the messaging system.

Posted (edited)

Goran, i know you probably don't like me very much, but i kinda get the feeling that you're launching personal attacks on me. please, refrain from doing so, if you have a dispute, i'd be glad to settle it via the messaging system.

Wow! Where did that come from??!!

I didn't make one single personal attack on you. On the contrary, I was absolutely amazed at how fast you did the Fokker.

If I didn't like you, wanted to launch a personal attack on you, or had a dispute, you would have known about it quite a while ago.

I just mind my own business and try to get my work done.

I'm actually one of the people giving you the benefit of the doubt and seeing what you come up with next after that Airbus fiasco.

Edited by Goran_M
Posted (edited)

Wow! Where did that come from??!!

I didn't make one single personal attack on you. On the contrary, I was absolutely amazed at how fast you did the Fokker.

If I didn't like you, wanted to launch a personal attack on you, or had a dispute, you would have known about it quite a while ago.

I just mind my own business and try to get my work done.

I'm actually one of the people giving you the benefit of the doubt and seeing what you come up with next after that Airbus fiasco.

in that case, i apologize, it's just that the way you worded the statement about hte fokker seemed rather strange, using words like "dumping the 787" i thought it was meant to be insulting. Either way, sorry about that. i've been cautious about what others are saying here, so i'm a little nervous when i read things that may come off wrong. Sorry for singling you out like that.

Edited by Michael_Chang
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...