Tom Knudsen

I am sorry, but I fail to see the relevance to my question for a ng pro version

Awesome news, will give it a try

Looks awesome Sent fra min SM-N9005 via Tapatalk

Version 10.30 b3 is now out Some important fixes

http://youtu.be/B79E5TeUtKQ?t=25s Features: FlyJSim quality, including attention to detail and flight dynamics Realistic Sound engine provided by DreamEngine & Turbine Sound Studio sounds Exterior Accurate replica of the 737-200adv Detailed textures Detailed animations Wing flex Detailed lighting Interior Detailed 3D cockpit High resolution textures on panels Detailed cockpit lighting Intuitive cockpit manipulation Systems Simulated Air system Anti-Ice Autopilot(SP77) Com/Nav radios Electrical Fire protection Hydraulics Fuel Warning systems Weather radar Realistic flight model Weight & Balance Manager Detailed manuals 6 liveries included AerLingus Air France Aloha Airlines KLM Southwest WestJet http://www.flyjsim.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=37:732-twinjet-released http://www.flyjsim.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=36:732_twinjet&Itemid=2

Give that man a direct line to X-Plane

Silence is normally the best answer for developing progress. But for us that longs for a sneakpeak the time is our enemy, well at least an annoying friend So might I ask for any development news or an "over the shoulder" video while we wait for this gorgous lady to be finished?

But how does it look without photoscenery?

In the spirit of waiting.

And by that statement you render this post totally useless

Boeing 757 without any doubt

Ever heard the saying "never change a winning team" John?

Sound logical Morten, and of course I would rather see v1.0 than any cool feature

Theres a huge difference between critisim and condescending, to bad so many cannot tell them apart.

Huge like

Sorry Lean, my bad and typo, .com it is I too have been at AVSIM for many years and seen my share of things. But thats properbly why tend to not understand trigger happy sobs. There is a fine balance i know, but if you are to host a community you need to have a larger ceilings, show members the respect they deserve and argue their actions when the are wrong. However majory violations should generate a warning for repeted offenders, but it is the moderators job to remove posts and threads that conflicts with the rules, not automatic ban a member for i.e doing something wrong. Nevertheless, I will not argue with the moderator team over at x-plane.org and the reason is simple and let me quote Mark Twain "Never argue with idiots, they just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience"

Sure hope you will provide some performance documentation to Professional Flight Planner X by Aerosoft sometime after the release as well. To fly this wonderful aircraft will take a bit knowledge into such, but hey thats fun and why I wish upon such and addition.

I switched between 16 different airports, tried with both default light and aerosoft light and at different time of day. All runway lights now work seamless. The red/black issue at tower/buliding lights are known bugs related to x-plane not script or aerosoft. Cannot see any issues more

Any news updates?

Tested it and confirm a huge improvement. The sun blending light is a cool feature that needs to be evaluated over time, wish this would be optional in next update. But for now excellent John, nice work on the clouds too which provide an slight performance increase..

Fly with Lua Light Tweak version 1.04 is now out "Runway Light is now fixed" http://xp-developer.com/index.php?/files/file/10-fly-with-lua-light-tweak/ Enjoy!

Good news, well it can be dabated.. However, I finally could reproduce the light bug and are now fully working to remedy this bug forever.. Stay tuned

Never use more than one script in the script folder if you are not 100% sure that the same code is not listed in each .lua file I would recommend settings atleast high Thanks for letting me know, will try to reproduce this and see if I can narrow it down to which line of code it affects.

Thank you Camron, that explains it very well. Sure hope they aren't involved in other places

This I cannot understand, it totally blows my mind and I will not even begin to figure it out. Why to community sites that I would imagine serve the flight simulator community go an ban their own members. Ok, I see the issue if there is a strong violation of attacking persons or breaking the law. But banning members without any cause is to me fundamentaly wrong. So first I got banned from X-Plane.org, but thats what I had to pay for starting xp-developer.org. But today when reading the second latest blogg by Ben Supnik I visit the X-Plane review link and got this message So I wonder, how the heck could one get banned from such a site? Did I read the review wrong or did I comment a review in a negative fashion. My question would be, what could they possible be earning by banning members? Lets tank about real reasons for banning, in my mind every site should have at least a good portion of common sence, and If the violation is so harsh that it needs to be adressed, hell give the member a fare chance to explain him self. If the offender repetes him self, well then ban him. Reasons I would imagine could qualify for banning * Personal attacks on character * Repeted trolling the site/forum * Spamming * Hacking, spoofing, phising, immicing etc. * Serious violations for forum rules such as religion, sex, copyright etc. But hell, I must have done some horrible things in order to be banned from a review site LOL... Further more, when I started xp-developer.org I did not imagine the site would ever be a threat to anyone but more a useful resource for developers where they can discuss while developing. Intentions where not to capture or steal members from other places and as far as I know, the only serious place out there that acknowledge and understood this was x-pilot.com The same could not be said about xp-aviators.com and x-plane.org where I got banned instantly. Nevertheless, I am still live and kicking but more or less gobsmacked by these policies..