Jump to content

jolmos

Members
  • Posts

    139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by jolmos

  1. Good news. I look forward to You.
  2. Taxi straight & curve guide limit
  3. I think the basic difference is in the micro-processor. Yours is notoriously superior to mine. Thank you very much.
  4. I corrected my previous post incorporating the relevant images.
  5. Dear Friends. I have a serious problem with FPS when using the B733-IXEG. Both cockpit and exterior view I have a maximum of 22fps, despite being parked in a simple scenario. I have extracted the XPL 52GB determined between scenes, planes and terrain mesh of "altpilotX", also took some plugins. I did all this to let the X-Plane as light as possible on the use of its attributes the microprocessor and RAM. Unfortunately, to no avail. FPS remain at the same level commented. However, when I use other aircraft, such as MD-Rotate, came to have 28 to 30 fps. Not really I can do to solve this problem, which irritates me up, because my taste for flying the IXEG. I attached information regarding AMD, computer, rendering and file log.txt for purposes that could help me without watching something that could be the source of the problem. Of course, thank you very much for your support. Log_JorgeOlmos.txt
  6. "Ricardo 2696", "Mortem" and "K4bel123", thank You very much for being so generous in your explanations. I am in the process of following your suggestions.
  7. I think you're right Ben Russell. But do not be angry because I asked, from my ignorance, if the problem may be that I have on my computer or on the product. If you read carefully what I wrote, I clearly expressed my satisfaction with IXEG. If any expression was not happy in my request for help, I apologize. If this occurred was only as a result of not being able to express myself well in English.
  8. Dear Friends. I apologize if my lousy English has failed to properly express the problem of "frames" I expressed. From what I have been able to verify on the Internet, I'm not the only driver who has experienced a significant drop in FPS when loading the IXEG. Obviously it is not my intention to discuss unnecessarily if we are few or many who have problems with IXEG FPS. I'm interested in solving this problem, for a very simple reason: the development of IXEG is - by far - the best simulated aircraft. As well it was expressed above, this development puts "accent" essentially flying: avionics and instruments. To the extent You can help me, I tell You the following extructura on my computer: Windows 7 - Service Pack 1 - 64 bit AMD Radeon R9 380 - 2 GB RAM 16 GB CPU: Intel Core i5-3570K - 3,4GB Memory: GDDR5 X-Plane 10.50 I followed, I believe that with more detail, the procedures suggested by X-Plane and various forums to get a Rendering Options settings appropriate to the highest level of FPS. I have also set the video card to the best possible resolution. No additional software to X-Plane and its plugins, when running the simulator does not operate. The addons scenerys are only approved by X-Plane.org. Rendering configuration Options: https://s21.postimg.org/y2fkw74d3/image.jpg By changing aircraft (MD88-Rotate, Baron 58, ...), the FPS grow significantly from the level reached with IXEG. Specifically, the B733-IXEG, I can not exceed 22-23 FPS; in contrast with the other desarrrollos they are reached 35-38 FPS. For these reasons, I thought that "weight" IXEG textures were influencing the FPS achieved; because, as I understand it (and still being infinitesimal expressions), the greater the weight of textures carries a greater effort to micro-processor; with the consequent result in the frame rate represented. Since already many grascias the help you can give me. From Argentina, I cordially greet
  9. Please do not forget to improve textures to prevent substantial FPS consumed . Thank you very much.
  10. In my computer (Qcore i5 4GB and AMD R9 380 2GB), with SkyMaxx Pro 3.3 I los 25-30% of FPS. I do not have this problem with others planes; for example, MD88 Rotate.
  11. The link between SMP and FPS is the subject of greater recurrence and analysis in the forum. I have carefully read all about it, but never found a solution to this conflict. Obviously the overlap between different states of time or , overlapping clouds in the same state , generates the mentioned conflict. SMP should provide for the elimination of the " residual" freeing the cache memory value. In other words , the attenuation of passage of a climate state to another or, their sequences within a state, should occur with a program that does not require historical memory. By the way , when our computer is similar to the possibilities of NASA , the problem - without disappearing - not noticed . It is clear that this occurs in a very small numberof simulators in the world. Others , we can only keep crying .However , I remain confident SMP team .
  12. CH Products Yoke
  13. Thank You so much "sizziano". Muchas gracias Javier. Pondré en práctica lo sugerido. Y comentaré el resultado.
  14. Achievement not know what is the appropriate time to activate VNAV. I proceed to do a takeoff and climb I understand they are correct, however, when I try to activate VNAV, the AP alarm is triggered. Activation of LNAV no difficulty. At one point, unable to explain the reasons, I can turn the VNAV. Does VNAV activation is related to which parameters for operation? From already thank you very much.
  15. Thank You so much "mpedroni".
  16. You have to setup de HDR in the Rendering options.
  17. The value of 20% for CG and 3.6 for TRIM, remains constant regardless of the value of Ground-Weight. The ability to manually change these values (using the fwd or aft keys) seems to mean only a shift forward or backward load, with impact on the values for CG and TRIM. Now, what it is the reference should have the pilot program the flight, for a correct value of CG and TRIM? The mode that defines these variables IXEG not shown understandable.
  18. The Weight & Balance menus offer some difficulty in the exact configuration of FUEL and WEIGHTS. Indeed, the displacement of the bars to select FUEL and WEIGHTS values, lack adequate sensitivity for accurate and quick selection. It should be corrected.
  19. Absolutely with you "Cameron". 737-IXEG is, obviously, the best development applied to X-Plane. There was only one misstep. No doubt that drivers are backed by responsible people. It only remains to wait a short time and everything will be better. Congratulations.
  20. IXEG 1.0.7 Excellent Friends. Congratulations ¡¡¡¡ Anda ... we go for more ¡¡¡¡ Thank You so much. From Argentina.
  21. Please consult you wish the following. He had set the button HAT "horns" for a view of several angles from the 3D cockpit, without leaving it. I can not recover that function. And, I could not find an assignment in the X-Plane to retrieve the said function. How do I configure this button to have that functionality?
  22. Sorry Tom. Thanks again.
  23. Thanks so much, Tom.
  24. To setup a joystick button associated with ixeg reference / 733 / autopilot / LNAV_mode_toggle , I could not find in X -Plane that recognizes it. Please , how should I proceed?
  25. To setup a joystick button associated with ixeg reference / 733 / autopilot / LNAV_mode_toggle , I could not find in X -Plane that recognizes it. Please , how should I proceed?
×
×
  • Create New...