Jump to content

UA90

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    135

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Everything posted by UA90

  1. UA90
    I don't know if you are aware of this, but one of the ATS members left the team in outrage over some issues at the .org forums, and now it's unlikely that they will be able to recover and release this things, let alone the MD-82 .
  2. UA90
    You can directly quote from the post like I just did. Generally if there's no release date given, there is no release date.
  3. UA90
    Currently there's no planned release date as he is the only developer (someone correct me if I'm wrong), which can slow down rate of progress and predictability of schedule. Welcome to the forum!
  4. UA90
    Welcome to the forum. Please read the first post next time before asking this type of question. Cheers.
  5. UA90
    Umm... are you saying the plane is bad? Cause by no means is the XP10 default 747 a good aircraft for today's standards. And also, the people here work on their own time frame, so don't expect a release too soon, 4 months isn't a lot of time.
  6. UA90
    Oh come on @Peter T.! This is just getting ridiculous! (I mean that in the best way possible).
  7. UA90
    @Peter T. You know what? As long as it kinda looks correct, it's decent (at least by my standards); but if it's like the Heinz 787 (not even close), then that's another story .
  8. UA90
    Hey @Peter T., I know you guys are disappointed at the fact that you aren't able to bring good avionics into your planes, but please, don't be so negative. It's okay to say that we can't bring you the best of what's out there, but it's not comfortable to anyone to hear you guys talk about your project as being bad. In fact, you are motivating yourself to neglect the project even more if that is going to be your attitude for the rest of the project(s). I know this might sound like I'm bad mouthing the project (which I'm not), but I only wish for you to do the best, despite your possible limitations. Keep a good spirit! Regards. - Yann
  9. UA90
    It's on Aerobridge Studio's facebook page.
  10. UA90
    Love the OH Panel!!!
  11. UA90
    Does that mean that it will be payware?
  12. UA90
    Not nearly. I know what you are thinking though ... I feel the same
  13. UA90
    Wow! I like that even the windows are cut out in the fuselage!
  14. UA90
    Look at the first post
  15. UA90
    I just want to take a moment to apologize for my actions in this topic regarding the post I made earlier today. Next time I will do better
  16. UA90
    Just saw XP11PB2 come out; shame they didn't include QL support
  17. UA90
    Lol, humans make mistakes sometimes
  18. UA90
    Well, why not?
  19. UA90
    Well I got the wingview (with X-Camera), it looks exactly like the PMDG NGX wing .
  20. UA90
    Is this for X-Camera? I don't mind using it if I have to.
  21. UA90
    What a shame since the MD-80 has an interior
  22. UA90
    Sad to see that the Default 737 won't let us have a wingview , is there any alternative besides using the x737 or the X-Camera plugin?
  23. UA90
    This will kill every 777 (including FlightFactor) for X-Plane when its released because of its looks! Wonderful!!
  24. UA90
  25. UA90
    "I'm out"
×
×
  • Create New...