Cameron

Hello, all, This will serve as a formal forum announcement that we have released the version 1.5.1 update for the Cessna Corvalis TT. All customers who have purchased the Cessna Corvalis TT up till now have been sent an e-mail by X-Aviation with complete installation instructions on how to update your product. We have made this a very simple process! For those that purchase the Cessna Corvalis TT from today forward, your purchased download will already be updated to version 1.5.1 for you. What if I didn't get the update e-mail? If you did not receive your update e-mail don't fret! X-Aviation has updated our system to allow all customers to update with ease, regardless of whether you received an e-mail for the update! Here's what to do: 1. Login to your X-Aviation account here: https://www.x-aviati...talog/login.php 2. View your past order history invoice that contains the Cessna Corvalis TT purchase on it. 3. At the bottom of the invoice you will find a blue highlighted link to your update that says: "Cessna Corvalis TT". There are some important fixes and requests implemented in this update. The following is a list of additions/fixes included: Quick reminders: New, friendlier activation systemX-Plane 10 compatible only64-bit compatible onlyUnder the hood changes: Fixed bug that caused a crash-to-desktop when HSI was set to NAV2 and user turned/pressed the “course” knobFixed bug that prevented the Waypoint window from being displayed when you press the “ENTER” Key on the MFDFixed bug where the nearest airports “height” field was displaying meters instead of feetFixed bug where FMS would not track flight plan waypoints correctlyAs always, thanks for being a customer with X-Aviation. We appreciate your feedback and support! Enjoy these latest updates, and stay tuned to the forum as we continually announce the latest happenings.

This product will be for X-Plane 10 only.

X-Plane 9 is 32-bit....that sentence doesn't make sense. Try deleting your prefs for X-Plane in the output folder and re-launch sim.

I guess you should reconsider what you put in the public domain, and how you act in said domain. Welcome back (a month later). Don't do it again (nice editing skills, by the way). I hope that's clear enough.

We will.

We were thinking more like Montana.

We will someday get to SOCAL. It will not be our next release, however. We have plans to eventually introduce Enhanced versions of our legacy sceneries. These will likely not be free.

Sure it is.

Looking good!

Loved it...nice job!

I would be curious to see results of the 780 on X-Plane. While the mem bandwidth was lowered on the 680 over the 580, the 680 still ripped the 580 apart for a lot of things in X-Plane. In particular, fill rate was VASTLY improved, providing a pretty fluid experience in X-Plane 10 on a large monitor...something I can't say for the 580.

The unwritten truth/word is that it can, but it's not advertised as such because Laminar doesn't test for it. This changed relative recently. Nvidia was involved in explaining the bits of weak points in code if I remember it right. I personally haven't tested it recently and don't know anyone who has, but I'm sure they're out there.

That's shocking. I used a specific case study in sim to compare my two cards. In the same scenario, the 2GB gave me between 19 and 26 fps. The 4GB, on the other hand, shot into the 45-60 range. Of course, this meant I was exhausting my VRAM on the 2GB since the boards and chips are pretty much the same. So long as you're not really exhausting that, your performance between the two should be pretty similar (is SOC higher speed than classified?). For some people, you're right...the 780 is a no brainer. That said, I would hesitate against a 4GB card for my situation (bandwidth means squat if I'm exhausting mem!), and to MOST people it's going to be about bang for buck. With the Titan, 780, and 680 all being out now, the 680 no doubt is a great bang for dollars spent. The performance is fantastic.

True, though relatively "negligible" within X-Plane. It depends on your setup (screen resolution, desired texture settings, etc). In some instances the 680 in 4GB form may be better (I have this card after upgrading from the 2GB version...HUGE difference for the settings I run). The 780 is no slouch, and also why I mentioned it. You really can't go wrong with either card!

Sounds like a nice, new machine, Jim. I'm not entirely sure on the Titan (great card), mainly because it gets bottlenecked on a lot of CPUs, but it certainly won't run X-Plane bad! Have you considered 4GB 680 or 3GB 780 instead? You may get more bang for your buck there! Either way, you'll have a lot of jealous people in the X-Plane community after you.

I don't entirely follow what you're saying here, but if you're asking why you may sometimes be there and sometimes not, the answer is because if some files have the same number of votes and same rating, it will cycle through them.

Amazing work! Thanks for showing us some early work!

No, we will not be developing for Outerra 3D. This model is strictly for X-Plane. This is already in place. Depending on sun angle you will see various glares. Other than the fact they sound awesome I can't reveal anymore at this time. This is the 340A model and it's way too early to be discussing B at this time.

We're real close to such a release. 10.22 is definitely a step forward, but SASL is not something we ship. You'll get an email as soon as it's released!

Thanks for the purchase! Definitely sounds of a weird memory error. OpenGL used to fight for the space. There could be so many different things happening here. You're talking about aircraft with their own code. I don't know enough about your situation or the 777 to speak on it from a technical level, but it could even be programming bugs. I think this is false. Gizmo's memory imprint is incredibly small in X-Plane. I genuinely don't believe it's a memory wall issue. The imprints are entirely too small for that. We're not even hearing similar reports from anyone, which causes more suspicion.

Uh, what are you talking about? We're not aware of any conflicts.

Hi, Folks!, Today we're showing off another quick set of previews for the Saab 340A, and along with it we are announcing something we feel is quite exciting! In addition to all the liveries you have previously seen (and the more that you will see) created by Theo, we are extremely excited to announce that Leen de Jager has been secretly working on liveries for this aircraft as well! For those of you that don't know (if you've been living on the moon), Leen is a very talented artist who has provided the community with many free, quality liveries in the past. You can see some of his work here. The following Silver Airways livery is one that Leen produced for us (my personal favorite). In the coming days we'll continue to show more of his work! The scenery in the screenshots is the amazing Wilmington 2.0. Enjoy! Want to see past previews? Click here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here!

This is the dyslexic variant.

It means you're using a file extension that is not accepted. Be sure to use the attachments uploader for your post, and be sure it's a valid file format. PIC is definitely not one, and copying and pasting to the window will not work.

When we're ready to. This question has got to be my number one pet peeve around here.