Cameron

Hit or miss, and you may have got lucky. This has not worked on most anyone's computer we have told to attempt this with, and again, dumbing down of scenery settings has cured the issue. 64-bit will alleviate much. Thanks for sharing your finding in your circumstance, however!

Hello, NR, Yes! More can be found on the X-Pilot announcement for this here: Thanks for your support!

Two of your three questions are the same, with the third basically asking if anyone would reply.... Ben answered this. No, the situations have not been improved.

Announcements about this project and where it will go will be made as the time comes. For the moment it is too far to speculate anything further than what we have shown.

Thanks for that! All in the clear, and understood! Philipp will likely be on this soon...

Hello, We have no record of an order number from you. Can you please specify your X-Aviation order number?

Very nice!

No, there is no flight-planning tool that works with the CRJ-200. The manual indicates how to save flight plans and re-load them for later use.

The official forum for UFMC support is located at: http://www.xplanefreeware.net

No problems here.

Hi, Stuart, Post #5 is where you should be directing your attention in this topic. Unfortunately, new computer or not, it is not the save-all to our problems! The fact that we are running a 32-bit application (X-Plane) is our problem. 64-bit is around the corner, but until then we are limited by the resources of a 32-bit application unable to use all of the memory we have in our computers these days. This problem is sporadic at best. We have a ton more people that do NOT have this problem than one's that we do, but in all cases so far we have seen this ONLY happens in X-Plane 10 and with computers facing memory exhaustion due to many factors (including, but not limited to too high or rendering settings or scenery load). Please direct your attention to post #5 here and give it a go.

Beautiful livery!

Fixed. Was changed due to software update defaults.

We do not release any ETA's for projects. That said, Javier is currently on a vacation for the next few weeks, so he'll be out of pocket.

See the following:

For what it's worth, it is my belief that the real hit would be from CPU processing on the systems more-so than the rendering of the 777 object so long as it's modeled well. I do not even know if or how big a FPS hit the systems modeling may end up being either, but Philipp tends to know what he's doing with optimization. There are a number of factors to consider when purchasing a video card. For starters, what size of a monitor will you be connecting this to? I have to admit, my upgrade process has been: ATI 5870, Nvidia 580, Nvidia 680. The NV side has kicked the snot out of my ATI experience each and every time. I'm honestly impartial to either brand...just want to have what always works best! I know that the 680 is expensive, but consider how long it will LAST! That is where your investment comes in. Anyhow, let's figure out your current specs before we push further in this discussion...

I have to say, the 680 chomps through X-Plane 10 VERY well! I am overly pleased with this card and its performance at max settings.

My thanks to all of you! It has been a great day with family and it's been an awesome experience through the years getting to know you all, and I look forward to many more years to come! Thanks for helping to make this community a friendly place!

Blender or AC3D!

Hi, John, For starters, please be aware that what you are converting is not what you see when you load the CRJ. You are only converting the underlying flight model into an OBJ. Generally this is used as a started point for developers to further refine, though these days we don't even use that feature so much. I don't know what you may be missing, but just wanted to put that disclaimer in there. No paint schemes or anything like it will carry over.

I think you meant to say Philipp As has already been stated no matter what you see, it's to be properly fixed as it is on Ben Supnik's radar.

Hey, John...yes, it will fly.

Yes, however, if you are running the latest version of X-Plane 10 then you can actually alias/shortcut your Custom Scenery folder to only ONE of the installs to save on space. This was something I worked with Ben Supnik to add a couple of months back at a conference in Columbia, SC. Lastly, however, to my knowledge the Airbus from Peter does NOT utilize SASL, and as such no issues should be present even if Gizmo is installed (just as is stated here that errors still exist even with Gizmo removed).

Do you have an NVidia card by chance?