Cameron

As an update to this thread, the Jetstream 32 Community Update has now been released to all customers. Instructions on installation may be obtained by checking your e-mail. Cheers!

The effect is one that has major issues with various aspects of the sim, and something Laminar HIGHLY discourages from using. I personally feel it's better to wait for what Laminar has in store.

Please see the last reply I made just 2-3 days ago. The answer has not changed! As this update is in no way official or supported by the vendor, there are other priorities taking place at the moment. Announcements on such things will come in the days to follow. Anyways, no sense in asking. The short answer is and always will be "yes" and nothing more to your question. Thanks for your enthusiasm though!

Cool idea! That said, from a business standpoint it does not make much sense. We've learned variations don't tend to be the selling points we anticipated them to be.

Any such news will be sent to your email (soon) once it's out!

System clock is necessary. Perhaps try synchronization with Microsoft server time just prior to activation?

I think the screenshots in the very first pic depict very well what you're going to get, Chris. Have patience and let them do their thing.

Why? Was post #22 not good enough for you to care and understand? You haven't given much else ever since... I also strongly suggest you research the difference between VRAM and virtual memory. Not the same thing, and you are entirely misunderstanding the context of this conversation because of it!

Stupid phone spell correct!

How did you set your VRAM to 16? That makes no sense at all. I don't believe there is a consumer GPU equipped with such sizes.

Hey Jerome, Appreciate the feedback, but in the future please be mindful of bringing back topics that have been idle for so long.

There is no such thing. I think you're confused.

Sounds like bad drivers or a going bad GPU, OR you are running out of vram. None of this sounds like a plugin issue at all.

An update to this... MaxWaldorf finally responded via email with everything necessary to move forward, so this 'update' will be available to all customers. I was not going to get into this further, but I believe some people should be made aware given a recent post by Tony Altimini (MaxWaldorf) in his support thread for this add-on about what really happened (and yes, the reason it was not out yet to X-Aviation customers even though he provided a package a week ago is because of his lack of reply to e-mails or questions). In short, all Tony (MaxWaldorf) was ever asked to do was simply answer two direct questions that never got directly answered over the course of many emails. Sadly, he tended to ignore some emails instead (on purpose). If he did reply, he would evade the simple distribution term questions and sign off his e-mails with things like: "Show is over... Close the curtains." I'm not sure what provoked this arrogant side, but I tried numerous times to keep him on track and just answer the two simple questions so we were all on the same page. The questions revolved around compensation for the package (basically saying we could distribute without compensation to him) where MaxWaldorf simply needed to reply back stating he was good to have us distribute with no money owed to him (we are a payware store, after all), and the other clarifying his preferred method of distribution for this file since some things were contradicting (MaxWaldorf started off discussions saying he wanted the package in a separate file, while Javier was saying he wanted it in the User Modification folder within the package). We wanted to ensure we were respecting his distribution wishes and not stepping on any toes, so clarification was necessary for reasons like Ben's post above since X-Aviation is not the author of the package. I'm not sure why it had to take this long for such simple and straight forward speaking to be had from MaxWaldorf, but it did! All we wanted from the get-go was to be on the same page, with clear terms, and smooth sailing. Simple. Unfortunately the process was made hard for unknown reason, but oh well, it's done now. We'll do our best to get this out soon!

Wait, what? How was I vague? Pretty sure I said everything that needed to be said without being vague! The first and second mini paragraphs of my post explain exactly that!

At this time we have been unable to get Tony Altimini (MaxWaldorf) to reply to e-mails acknowledging he is okay with distribution in a manner that would make it legal for us to do so. Thus far he has danced around the issue (not really sure why). So, in complete candor, the hold up for release is because MaxWaldorf has not responded to our requests for authorization of distribution or clarification on his terms for properly distributing the package. I'm sad that it's come to this for folks like you, but sometimes it's hard for guys to get past their own arrogance it seems. We will likely include some more information in an e-mail to all customers to clarify this issue with you and understand the approach Mr. Altimini has taken on this issue at this time if we don't hear from him soon. I know it sucks, but hang in there!

We have come to no firm agreement.

Might I remind you what you said?... I need not say more. I wholeheartedly beg to differ. X-Plane add-on users are some of the most vocal customers I have ever seen or met. If something's amiss, they speak up.

I suppose for the same reasons I listed above? The functionality is there. If whomever Laminar hired/contracted to create an aircraft used the available datarefs then it will work as it should. More on that here: http://forums.x-pilot.com/topic/8078-inconsistent-ambiance-sounds/?p=86916

This entire part of your post is ignorant. You're responding to a thread from 2013 that hasn't had a response since 2014. The latest versions of the software are from 2015. That alone should tell you something. Your crashes most definitely need investigation on both sides to solve. Unlike you, we have data. Data that shows MANY thousands of users using this product with no crashes. It leaves little doubt that something more is actually happening client side. Be it too high of settings in the control panel mixed with scenery and exhausting your VRAM, to having a conflict with some code. As developers the focus is on the product. Customers are bound to have way more plugins than we ever will, so yes, you need to be diligent and troubleshoot. One thing is for sure...SkyMaxx Pro has been one of the best handled support cases for after sale service I have ever seen. The devs have given many free upgrades over the last two years and always solved any kinds of actual bugs that customers have found. This I am certain of.

It already does this. It's up to the aircraft developer to set the proper datarefs. One of the guys here made a script for his aircraft to properly set the aircraft dataref so he could hear the sounds with doors open just as SoundMaxx is designed to do.

I've removed the log file text you added in here. Please don't paste it. Instead, add it as an attachment.

Thanks for your patience. Not sure about a ticket lasting that long. Seems very excessive but I'm not in a place where I can check it right this second to be sure. The forums are not to be a running place for inquiries like this though.

Remove the signature in Tapatalk. The forum will automatically apply the real one anyhow.

It's all in your head. I stand by what I said with regards to your reason for posting. Deny all you want. It doesn't matter enough to change my mind. The fact you even try to make up reasons why someone would ever come after you tells me you know someone may validly dislike you at some point though. If you have such feelings and can't take things dished out at you when you can be blunt yourself, I think it's time you re-think your approach with people. For such a negative character at times you sure do have soft feelings.