Jump to content

Cameron

X-Aviation
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,010

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    459

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Cameron

  1. Cameron
    IXEG.net
  2. Cameron
    You're back! Got that video yet? You're busy talking about ultra realism, all the while you previously showed me a 767 wing to model after. I've got the 3d modeler open just itching to put this in for you! I need your 737-300 video from seat 14D stat!
  3. Cameron
    My point exactly. For that video alone they even had to zoom just to show it! Anyways, thanks for actually posting a video rather than going on about nonsense. I'm sure the team as a whole will do as Jan said and asess the necessity of this after release.
  4. Cameron
    We missed you, Dondel. Thank God you're back.
  5. Cameron
    You're not really helping the case here. I've asked you to help out. Jan, whom you are referring to, also agreed with my followup post on lack of wing flex. A wing will naturally have some sort of flex. That flex is POINTLESS to model if it can essentially not be easily seen. So, again, I ask you to please find us a video of a 737-300 showing the amount of wing flex you're looking to have modeled. I couldn't find any on YouTube. Plenty of 737-300 wing videos out there, just none with flex, even in turbulence, so I'm asking you to now help out in understanding what you feel is worth modeling from a real video of the real aircraft which you find.
  6. Cameron
    You're making no sense. You just showed me a video of a 767-300, and a 737 NG, both of which have much larger wings. This is not a 737-300 you have shown me. Therefore, what you have shown me is also not a realistic representation. I suggest you read what you search rather than tell me I should search. I've been a part of this discussion from the get-go.
  7. Cameron
    Hey there, If you don't mind, please find us some video of a 737 Classic flexing its wings in the way you wish it to. Seems some of you are having a hard time understanding this aircraft has such minimal to nil wing flex that I'd like your proof of what it should look like instead.
  8. Cameron
    Hello Captains, I know a lot of you enjoy seeing some form of progress, so I'm providing you with a few screenshots showing off the exterior of the 737 Classic. As per usual, everything is a work in progress, but I hope you enjoy! Remember to click on the images to see a slightly larger version!
  9. Cameron
    IXEG appearances are scheduled as follows: January 8th - Frankfurt - FKK World January 12th - Daytona Beach, FL - Bob Evans January 20th - Schieferhof, Germany - Bernds Sauna Club January 27th - Carson City, Nevada - The Bunny Ranch (Jan is unable to attend this appearance due to family obligations) June 11th - Hartford, Connecticut - FlightSimCon 2016
  10. Cameron
    Indeed, those are SkyMaxx Pro clouds. People may misinterpret your title and video to think those clouds are produced by Ultra Weather XP. They are not.
  11. Cameron
    It's a starting point suggestion. A lot of people seem to fail to understand that SkyMaxx Pro 3 has less a memory footprint than version 2. Where they get stuck is when they don't realize v3 sliders produce MORE clouds/detail than said slider position in v2. In other words, with SMP 3, less is more when compared to v2. But you are complaining. You started with "we all should not have to..." But this is not FSX/P3D. So what?
  12. Cameron
    That's the way it works. Plenty of topics about how and why throughout the forums!
  13. Cameron
    Please consult my prior reply with regards to your concerns at this stage.
  14. Cameron
    Your obsession over a stick is starting to concern me.
  15. Cameron
    Turn your digits knob up?
  16. Cameron
    It will surely work with Win 7.
  17. Cameron
    This topic was about an X-Plane.org product. I don't care to comment on the rest of your post since it's a clear waste of energy.
  18. Cameron
    Indeed, they did!
  19. Cameron
    This is piracy. Sorry, but your justification of this sucks.
  20. Cameron
    Chill guys. Easy change. QC is our final step in the test phase of 3D model for now. Systems first. Nitpick after release, because what you see now is not final until it's, well....final.
  21. Cameron
    It's for X-Plane. It is not released yet.
  22. Cameron
    It's more or less buffeting and does not come into play until necessary. TrackIR works great with it.
  23. Cameron
    Built in!
  24. Cameron
    The reality is there's no way to "properly" simulate the lag anyhow. As Jan has said, over time airlines will invest and do CPU upgrades, thus making said systems much faster in calculation and reaction. Therefore, there's no correct "time", and truth be told we're not still in the 80's. We are very much so in the year 2015, where some 733's have most certainly been upgraded and are still in service.
  25. Cameron
    And it would.
×
×
  • Create New...