Is the -400 still planned?

[hamoody]

A while back, quite soon after release, I remember reading somewhere that the IXEG team had plans to model the 737-400 as some sort of expansion to the base aircraft. That was a while ago and I haven't heard anything about it since, so I was wondering if this is still on the table. Of course, I'm not asking for a release date or timeframe or anything, but it would be great to know if the status of the -400 is "yes, we definitely have plans to make it", or if it's been downgraded to "maybe someday, eventually, hopefully". 

The 400 is my favorite variant of the classic and I would love to have it in my hangar. 

[Litjan]

I would say: "We are not ruling out making one at one point in time."

[WickedClown]

As far i know next is 747-400 or am i wrong? 

[avantime]

8 hours ago, Litjan said:

I would say: "We are not ruling out making one at one point in time."

It can be an easy money maker, and it depends how complex you want to make it. Either cosmetic only (like the winglets) or create new performance profiles.

Given the sheer slowness of the update schedule I'm beginning to wonder if you guys will finish the addon faster if we pay you a little bit more money (a.k.a giving you a financial incentive). The IXEG is still not what I call "feature complete" 1.5 years after release, and it's a very pricey addon to begin with. In an ideal world IXEG would finish the addon for XP10 and charge a small sum for XP11 compatibility and extensions/DLC, but now we have an unfinished addon with free (but slow) XP11 updates.

 

[Cameron]

56 minutes ago, avantime said:

Either cosmetic only (like the winglets) or create new performance profiles.

It would not be cosmetic only. That is not how this team operates.

56 minutes ago, avantime said:

Given the sheer slowness of the update schedule I'm beginning to wonder if you guys will finish the addon faster if we pay you a little bit more money

We are not about to extort money out of people. Everyone has paid enough, and we appreciate their business.

57 minutes ago, avantime said:

The IXEG is still not what I call "feature complete"

We agree, and that's why work still continues on it.