jaromea Posted December 24, 2016 Report Posted December 24, 2016 IEXG 737 SHOULD HAVE a RAT system but where is it located.??? 2 Quote
crisk73 Posted December 24, 2016 Report Posted December 24, 2016 I believe the 737 doesn't have the RAT. Quote
Cameron Posted December 24, 2016 Report Posted December 24, 2016 Correct, 737s do not have RAT. Quote
Litjan Posted December 25, 2016 Report Posted December 25, 2016 Yeah - and where is the brake chute on this lame excuse for a 737? And the RATO´s??? I want my money back, pronto. 3 Quote
WR269 Posted December 25, 2016 Report Posted December 25, 2016 Where is the IFF? And attack radar? In flight refuelling?? Cmon! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 3 Quote
chris k Posted December 26, 2016 Report Posted December 26, 2016 Space Lazer Cannons and Unlimited Bar Cart in first class would be nice too... 2 Quote
jaromea Posted January 4, 2017 Author Report Posted January 4, 2017 not required because hydraulic systems in a ixeg 737 never fail ??? Quote
Litjan Posted January 4, 2017 Report Posted January 4, 2017 Let me elaborate a bit on why there is no RAT on the 737 (being type-rated on Airbus 320, currently). But first - there IS no RAT on the 737, so even if there was need for one, we would not model it. We are striving to make an exact replica of the 737-300 variant, not some dream-aircraft . Read up on the hyd systems here: http://www.b737.org.uk/hydraulics.htm The plane can fly without ANY hydraulic and ANY electric (unlike the Airbus)... therefore there is no need for a RAT. Jan Quote
WR269 Posted January 4, 2017 Report Posted January 4, 2017 Let me elaborate a bit on why there is no RAT on the 737 (being type-rated on Airbus 320, currently). But first - there IS no RAT on the 737, so even if there was need for one, we would not model it. We are striving to make an exact replica of the 737-300 variant, not some dream-aircraft [emoji14]. Read up on the hyd systems here: http://www.b737.org.uk/hydraulics.htm The plane can fly without ANY hydraulic and ANY electric (unlike the Airbus)... therefore there is no need for a RAT. Jan When that happens, it is known as a 707? [emoji23] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Quote
crisk73 Posted January 4, 2017 Report Posted January 4, 2017 35 minutes ago, Litjan said: (being type-rated on Airbus 320, currently) The plane can fly without ANY hydraulic and ANY electric (unlike the Airbus)... therefore there is no need for a RAT. Jan But we all know the 737 is your favorite.. Lufthansa's fault... 1 Quote
Eddie Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 We are striving to make an exact replica of the 737-300 variant, not some dream-aircraft [emoji14]. Too late. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.