Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Let me elaborate a bit on why there is no RAT on the 737 (being type-rated on Airbus 320, currently). But first - there IS no RAT on the 737, so even if there was need for one, we would not model it. We are striving to make an exact replica of the 737-300 variant, not some dream-aircraft :P.

Read up on the hyd systems here: http://www.b737.org.uk/hydraulics.htm

The plane can fly without ANY hydraulic and ANY electric (unlike the Airbus)... therefore there is no need for a RAT.

Jan

Posted
Let me elaborate a bit on why there is no RAT on the 737 (being type-rated on Airbus 320, currently). But first - there IS no RAT on the 737, so even if there was need for one, we would not model it. We are striving to make an exact replica of the 737-300 variant, not some dream-aircraft [emoji14].

Read up on the hyd systems here: http://www.b737.org.uk/hydraulics.htm

The plane can fly without ANY hydraulic and ANY electric (unlike the Airbus)... therefore there is no need for a RAT.

Jan

When that happens, it is known as a 707? [emoji23]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Upvote 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, Litjan said:

(being type-rated on Airbus 320, currently)

The plane can fly without ANY hydraulic and ANY electric (unlike the Airbus)... therefore there is no need for a RAT.

Jan

But we all know the 737 is your favorite.. Lufthansa's fault... :P

  • Upvote 1

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...