UA90
Members-
Content count
114 -
Joined
-
Last visited
1 Follower
-
Seriously? I'm sorry, but for your first post you've just gone completely out of line here. When something is in development, it's in development. Got it?
-
Never going to happen until the plane is released.
-
Never in a million years.
-
And to you Michael, congratulations on your success in your new career! All I care about now is wishing the best for you in the coming years, and I hope that other people can agree with me too!
-
He said that the source files don't exist anymore, which means the plane itself doesn't exist anymore. So I guess we only have screenshots for this aircraft unfortunately.
-
Welcome to the forums! Please read the topic further as it contains all the information regarding the release of this aircraft. Cheers!
-
McDonnell Douglas MD-11 & MD-11F project by A.T.S.
UA90 replied to AlfaMike's topic in Aircraft Development
I don't know if you are aware of this, but one of the ATS members left the team in outrage over some issues at the .org forums, and now it's unlikely that they will be able to recover and release this things, let alone the MD-82 . -
You can directly quote from the post like I just did. Generally if there's no release date given, there is no release date.
-
Currently there's no planned release date as he is the only developer (someone correct me if I'm wrong), which can slow down rate of progress and predictability of schedule. Welcome to the forum!
-
Welcome to the forum. Please read the first post next time before asking this type of question. Cheers.
-
Umm... are you saying the plane is bad? Cause by no means is the XP10 default 747 a good aircraft for today's standards. And also, the people here work on their own time frame, so don't expect a release too soon, 4 months isn't a lot of time.
-
Oh come on @Peter T.! This is just getting ridiculous! (I mean that in the best way possible).
-
@Peter T. You know what? As long as it kinda looks correct, it's decent (at least by my standards); but if it's like the Heinz 787 (not even close), then that's another story .
-
Hey @Peter T., I know you guys are disappointed at the fact that you aren't able to bring good avionics into your planes, but please, don't be so negative. It's okay to say that we can't bring you the best of what's out there, but it's not comfortable to anyone to hear you guys talk about your project as being bad. In fact, you are motivating yourself to neglect the project even more if that is going to be your attitude for the rest of the project(s). I know this might sound like I'm bad mouthing the project (which I'm not), but I only wish for you to do the best, despite your possible limitations. Keep a good spirit! Regards. - Yann
-
It's on Aerobridge Studio's facebook page.