Jump to content

coldy77

Members
  • Content Count

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

5 Neutral

About coldy77

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

707 profile views
  1. Hi, any news on the 1.5.2 Update for this Airplane? Its about a year now, when this Update was announced to fix the "low bank angle on turns" issue. Or can you provide just a simple fix for this? Flying online with such a turn rate is not the best you can do. Cheers, Michael
  2. Hi guys, alright, thx for your answers. I turns out, that uninstall the saab left many files still in the aircraft folders (I did not look at this before). After wiping out the whole folders incl. gizmo, and reinstall the aircraft, everything works as expected. Cheers, Michael
  3. I downloaded a fresh setup Saab 340A 1.5.zip from x-aviation.com und run the installer. This is, what I got. Why do you think, this is an old version of the Saab? I did a complete uninstall/download and reinstall, and the same result. No idea, where I can find any newer resources. Some files in the Aircraft-Folder are actually from March 2018 Cheers, Michael
  4. Hi again, just started X-Plane and still the same issue. Here are my logfiles. I see a lot of errors / file not founds in the logs files Cheers, Michael Log.txt GizmoLog.txt
  5. Hi Goran, will do this. But Saab is the only plane if have such issues with. Maybe something is in conflict with gizmo? I really have no clue here. Thanks, Michael
  6. Hey, to be more specific: Keyboard does not work at all - only works, if e.g. I open the XP settings dialog, but once I close this window, all keyboard inputs are not working. Anyone have an idea? Cheers, Michael
  7. Hi guys, after a while, I wanted to try out the SAAB 340A again with XP 11.20 (but had this issue a while ago also with earlier XP 11.10? version). Problem 1: I can not move the camera around or use the outside cam - I can not interact with cam at all. Wheel Zoom is actually working after changing the preferences Problem 2: GPS is not working: always get this error: error: 1988.634: Run(xp): G530_main: [string "JGX.2.G530.00.lua.aes"]:1016: attempt to index local 'G530navCycleFileHandle' (a nil value) It is a blank install of the aircraft and also Gizmo plugin. Anyone
  8. Hi guys, it has been a while since the release of 4.6 now. I only want to ask, if there are any news of upcoming updates or so? Will there be a 4.7 or 4.6.1 at some time? Its quite silent around SMP these days... Cheers, Michael
  9. Hi MercuryOneOne, I think, this is not only limited to SkyMaxx Pro, but also happens with XP Default Weather. Had this yesterday on a weather reload with 30mins refresh timeout. The stormfront seems to be shifted in the meanwhile right into my sky :). Fortunately I found myself in a liner, so my impact was not as deadly as yours. Have you checked "Never change weather where you fly (or similar)" in RWC? Cheers, Michael
  10. Without SMP I have a CPU usage of avg. 70%, and with SMP, the usage is at avg. 45%. It does not matter how I set the view distance or other settings.
  11. HI FlyAgi, I basically noticed the same on my setup, but I am not even close to 60fps :). So FPS impact hits me much earlier. So strange thing is, that with SMP, my overall CPU utilization is "much" lower, as without SMP, even with nearly no clouds visibile. I use 11.02b1 with the performance optimizations, and yes, I know - don't use beta unless you have to, but I couldn't resist, so I didn't post here any further. Would like to use SMP, but for me it is only usable until 25sqkm, which is not enough for my personal preferences of view distance. Cheers, Michael
  12. Hi Frank, tried out with nearly plain vanilla XP11. Same issue - same results. This is just for your interest, as you said, you cannot garantee working fine on all systems. Well, my setup is not very experimental I would say, and the setup from crisk73 is more or less standard right now, but I take it as it is... SMP would be fine, but not for me as it is unusable. And no, I will not live with coverage of 10sqkm or less. Cheers, Michael
  13. Hi Frank, very fast reply - impressive - thank you. You are right, most people talking about increases. I wonder about this too. Will check further with less plugins. After getting results I will post it here. If you talk about the static cirrus layer at 30k feet, this is there, I though about some a lower altitude. Cheers, Michael
  14. and with 50sqkm setting in SMP
  15. Same Picture with XP 11 default weather, much better fps
×
×
  • Create New...