Jump to content

Peter T.

Members
  • Posts

    665
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    35

Everything posted by Peter T.

  1. "This new group is full of serious X-Plane desktop simulator users/developers." yeesh....
  2. Please make this X-Plane 9 too!
  3. Aerobridge has been quiet...but i hope some people are still following us! here is a preview of our new ground textures
  4. Captain Sim 777 is also a new plane...but it look darn better then the 777 in my honest opinion
  5. Yuck! I dont like the overly exposed fuselage lines...it makes the 777 look wrinkly to me
  6. if the Captain Sim 777 has 4K Textures, it would of course looks better then Ramezzess 777....if it is 64 Bit, then it would of course run better then the 777 worldliner
  7. Ok here, now can you pick mine too?->
  8. Hey guys, i was curious how do you operate a virtual airline? is it really complicated?
  9. Ramezzess 777 lack accuracy in terms of exterior modelling while CaptainSim model accuracy is top notch. Xp10 777 have huge gears, inaccurate engine nacelle model with too many Fan blades, wingflex is wrong/strange, cockpit is a little cartoony, there are more but i forgotten. Captainsim 777 is better IMHO, model is very detailed like Ramezzess but not as complex in systems than Ramezzess 777. Also CaptainSim 777 product offer a wider range of models not just the 777-200LR, and liveries arent paid for and fictional.
  10. Wow! Just Flight now developing more for X-Plane! I wish you good luck! (Can't beta test sorry because im no expert)
  11. I wasn't arguing, I was surprised they allow XPDT to convert their models, I didn't know there was a freeware MD-11. as for this competition thing, it wasn't my intention to compete with them, it all started when Howard starting to bash at me in school and then on FB bragging about XPDT being superior then FSXP. My intention was almost the same as Colin in this thread, I was hoping that XPDT wasn't converting payware models and distributing it as freeware (as this happened before). I thought Overland only makes Payware. Sorry for misunderstanding.
  12. i made an airport terminal to test my skills in texturing...
  13. Prototype? you mean Beta? or first release?
  14. That is insane stuff! great work!
  15. Thank you guys for the compliments! I use AC3D for modelling and photoshop for textures. We are working on KJAC and LJPZ at the moment.
  16. Howard, I am not attacking, i am just saying that you want to be rivals with FSXP as you said on FB. thats all i know, its a response to Chris K and Litjan. And then you insult me and saying you will be better then us etc...
  17. So Howards wants to be rivals....with FSXP...thats all i know
  18. Me neither, oh well...bu i did make games before, one being an a320 simulator
  19. http://aerobridge.moonfruit.com/ sigh...i love website designing
  20. a co-founder has almost the same amount of power/rights as the founder, and that includes rights to post pictures.
  21. Yes Remlap is correct, and also a tiny bit too early in thinking you will succeed when you haven't completed your first plane. So go back to your workshop
  22. Howard, if you want competition then just say it, besides you will get no competition in 6 months due to lack of hardware for development for Michael. Your statement about no rivalries is untrue.
  23. I never shout out "DO IT DO IT DO IT" It was you wasn't it? always asking me to spill the beans out
  24. That is up to your team member founders to decide.
  25. the 787 is crap anyways
×
×
  • Create New...