Simon, Keep the reviews coming along. Reviews are by definition opinion pieces and the most useful ones are those that actually do take a position on a product/service then justify that position. I'm definitely not Org bashing here but I find the completely non-critical approach to reviewing there a bit of a nonsense. People really need to get independent information about what's good, and what's bad (and why...). I think the most important thing in any review process is consistency in application of standards and making certain that the "ratings" match the commentary. I certainly wouldn't worry about getting critical comment - it goes with the territory. Do you think that restaurant critics (think John Lethlean in The Australian - an example you may know) don't receive vigorous "feedback" from the people that they eviscerate? I think it's important to listen to the feedback (if it appears), evaluate it, decide whether you have been true to your own values then move on to the next review. As far as certain developers insisting you don't review their product. Well, if you've purchased it and want to put an opinion on a blog, that's free speech! More power to you, and keep reviewing that same developer as long as you feel you can maintain "objectivity". A final word on objectivity to bring us back full circle - reviewing is subjective - we all have pet hates (ie some won't rate an aircraft at all if it doesnt have a 3D cockpit..) just as long as "pet hates" are out there for all to see - it's all fair, especially if people have the opportunity to publicly respond - a possibility, I might mention, denied to most movie , restaurant etc reviews. Keep at it and have at it, full steam ahead! Be fearless, fair, and fun! Beej