Cameron

Given your word of choice to describe one's behavior, this argument is very weak.

Ben serves a very valid point in here through his posts collectively to which many of you seem to be taking to near extreme. His argument overall is not centered around Pete/Froogle. Be careful who you call a "d-bag" or similar. The door is not far behind you. Re-read objectively and be a bit more open minded before you go calling one of the guys who has produced software that brings to market some of the best add-ons to date (and coming...like IXEG) any names. Don't do that again.

I cannot find a valid purchase under your user account for X-Aviation. As this forum section is dedicated to these specific customers, please seek support at the location you purchased from.

Aside from bug fixes we do not anticipate expanding this aircraft any further.

Well, I didn't say that, but I did say the span of time to create such a release would be about that time. In any case, really cool stuff to show you guys coming up.

Google it?

This is the place to watch for updates when we have them...as well as your email.

Hey, guys, We've done a lot of work over the last few weeks to upgrade a lot of the bay area and in preparation to announce a new, big enhancement/feature to this product as a whole. We are very close to posting new shots, and more importantly, MUCH closer to a release! Keep your eyes peeled here over the next few days!

At the moment there is not such a checklist.

Not necessarily, no.

That's two now with the GTX 780.... For reference, the GTX 680 at relatively high settings in version 1.0 is averaging much higher than arb65912 is stating. Your situation is interesting because it indicates issues in exterior view, which to me also sounds very much so like a GPU or CPU bound issue.

This is extremely peculiar...why would you keep a 780 at such low settings as your norm?

Plain and simple, section 15 of what you agreed to when you purchased: 15. LICENSE APPLICABLE TO PRODUCTS SOLD No user of X-Aviation site may modify (personally or commercially) or re-distribute X-Aviation site products without prior written consent from an administrator at X-Aviation. Sharing methods of modification (how to do so) is strictly prohibited and is grounds for termination of a user license or account. An exception is made for aircraft re-paints, which may not only be modified, but may also be re-distributed. In this instance X-Aviation will typically provide a paintkit for user to modify files eligible for modification under these terms. This really isn't up for debate.

Are you speaking about while on the ground? There are wiper limitations in the air...

If you bother to read the thread you'll see that the workaround is only until the next update, where the issue is solved.

Out of memory and fps are not the same thing. None of the reports you have shown indicate anything similar to what you claim to have. I see a bunch of opinions for ones taste, but no wide range reports of slide shows like you claim.

Where?

Then you don't meet the requirements of the sought after beta tester, of course!

This section of the forums is for customers who purchased it from X-Aviation. Please consult with the org, as they have an entirely different installation process.

Okay!

So my first question is: Why are you re-installing in the first place? As for the error message: That is a very awkward error. To me it sounds like you have either selected an invalid X-Plane directory (resources/files ? ) or you are running the installer from its own zip file, which is a no-no. I've never seen this error before. As for getting the UA Express livery: Just run the livery manager.

Valentin, Kris is giving you some words of wisdom and you're becoming very defensive over it. He's not even being rude, but he is trying to let you know that your way of discussing this matter with people here is a lot of self-centered-like behavior. Anyways, Ben is right. This is a perfect use for something fun and quick in Gizmo. Because of this thread I just went and challenged myself to a have a little fun and wrote a little program that will automatically enable Sandy's Pilot View whenever in the cockpit, even if you come from exterior back to interior. It was also a good excuse to get my TrackIR off the shelf. All in all this took about 30 minutes to write after going through Sandy's docs, using dataref editor, writing, and testing. I bet you could have a lot of fun and enjoy the feeling of being rewarded visually with something that works if you just put your mind to it. Gizmo has freely available docs to accomplish what you need as well, so there's really no excuse unless you just don't want it that bad.

Remarkably, yes.

Props to you, Kris. Hueyman may not get it, but I say majority of all us others do. Thank you for your sensible posts time and time again!

Yes, we always notify by email.