Jump to content

mutestyles

Members
  • Posts

    181
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by mutestyles

  1. Will it have an FMS, Fly by wire, Yaw dampers, and onboard WIFI.... baaahhh ha ha haa. JK. looks great!
  2. Hes too young for white hair. But he may look 50 bye the time the CRJ is at version 3 lol if it goes that high
  3. Yippie!!!!!! would be nice to not have it crash I miss flying it already
  4. lol forgot to attach them
  5. my problems are back im still getn crashes when entering a SID even with the new navigraph. crash_log.txt Log.txt
  6. OK nevermind. I have figured it out. Throw the dunce cap on this fella. I was using the navigraph data i downloaded last week Jrollon one Not the VasFMS native one in the above post titled READ THIS MUTE YOU MORON YOU NEED TO CHANGE THE NAV DATA FORMAT. lol anyhow. Its runs fine now Thnx. But damn you all as i just used another 20 navigraph credits!! ha ha ha ha
  7. Ok Cameron i did as you suggested. But it crashed still. So im guessing this is a SID STAR issue with the FMS. As soon as I select the transition on the SID x plane freezes and then crashes heres the new crash log. Hope this helps crash_log.txt Log.txt
  8. I was programming the SID and STAR at the time of my crash as well
  9. Okay i was at SFO programming the FMS. Engines were on everything was ready to go then it crashed to desktop. UHG lol heres the logs crash_log.txtLog.txt
  10. About to start it up at LAX giver a try!
  11. You dont want to see it anyhow looks unreal and crappy to boot
  12. No not really all you have to do is hit Ride along view and its like the old chase view from xp9. No big deal at all
  13. You didnt use the irony emoticon...ha ha ha
  14. Hmm lets see here...Maybe because they took something that worked fine and looked great in beta 7 and made it look worse and run not as good. But yeah y am i complaining.... Hmmmm. And those screenies you took are a good example. If you would have took them around any populated area and not out where there are hardly any OBJs you woulda gotta lower frames than you were. Either way i can still get good frames just looks like crap..... Ahhhh beta 7 how i miss you. This video i made in beta 7 on vatsim. There were three layers of clouds, Extreme res.Mega tons obs,Tons on the roads, World detail distance very high and still got 45 frames around the clouds. 40,40,40 on the three sliders. New betas cant get that look anymore.
  15. Yes those cumulus clouds look good from below still as in 7 unless your 15K above them. Then not so much anymore. Either way nice pics. Add 3 layers of cumulus, Mega tons objs. At tom curtis KSEA and youll get in the 21 to 26 fps only
  16. Heres how they look at 35000 ft? Geese Yes the cumulus look good up close, and dog doo at altitude. I dont know what there things are. Wet paper?
  17. After enought people complained about the clouds this will be beta 15 clouds baahaa ha haaa
  18. Ben said they are unlikely to bring back the 3 sliders for clouds cuz its better for the masses. So i guess were stuck with the mashed potatoes
  19. Im sure the moving cloud issue will be dealt with in time. Just wish they didnt nerf the renderings so bad in beta 9. Taking away adjustments was not the way to go.
  20. i should start backing up my Betas on the external hard drive after this one.
  21. Man i wish i could go back to Beta 7 it looked so good and was fast. Just because so many are on older computers they are trying to please the masses and we are left to suffer with this crap. Ugh. Hopefully a fix is soon. beta 9 is crap :_
  22. I need an L desk like that
  23. CRJ 200 KPHL climb out Cloud sammich
  24. and then 3 minutes later squakbox weather got rid of all the clouds
  25. at cruise on the way to TNCM
×
×
  • Create New...