Nils, Quite true. I think what Tom's really trying to convey here is two things: 1. It shouldn't be called "best of," but "peoples choice" or something similar to that nature. 2. That as a person from MSFS coming to X-Plane for a first glance only to see something like that labeled as "best of" for X-Plane implies that it really IS the best it gets for X-Plane. The above second point should not be misconstrued to suggest that all of us don't appreciate others hard, free, and hobby-like work, but that the perception the actual vote title gives to the outsider can leave a lot to be desired and ultimately give a bad outlook on X-Plane itself in the sense that the aircraft voted "best" is certainly NOT the best potential that X-Plane has the ability to show or can is achievable. As it is, there are already plenty of MSFS users who have an automatic "ew" factor towards X-Plane for their own reasoning or another. Though this thread is more of a sarcastic message, it still has a comedic value to it. Worth a laugh and jab at least! This is exactly what i see happening on many occasion over at Flight Sim World (Prob one of largest MSFS sites around), have a look at these threads - http://www.flightsimworld.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=173445&hl=XPlane http://www.flightsimworld.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=179016&hl=XPlane http://www.flightsimworld.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=177843&hl=XPlane And none of them seem willing to give it a go after looking at the .org and what they see is to offer for sale there, i of course point them towards the MU-2 at every given opportunity and im promoting Javiers CRJ at every chance i get (aswel as all other Aircraft ive bought like the Tecnam P92). What i would like to see is some decent ground scenery and proper cities and towns.