Jump to content

SkyMaxx porn


canox

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, before I post any pictures Ill post my comp specs and my SMP settings.

My hope with this thread is to show you how amazing SMP can look and to help tweak your settings so its run well on your comp.

 

My current setup is an i5 4670, MSI GTX 760 4gb,  8gb ram and I use a 1080p 144hz monitor.  Xplane 10.25 64 bit on Windows 7.

For Xplane settings I use Very High textures, HDR with 4x (2x when SMP gets heavy), draw distance Very High.  I use OSM which uses a bunch of FPS.. but no HD mesh or orthophotos.  This is my standard setup which gives me solid FPS in most situations.  Since SMP is new I am still tweaking all the time.

 

For SMP settings the only things I recommend are Cirrus reso med/high, and Overcast on med.  God Rays usually off. Tweak the rest to your visual liking.  Also experiment with the different cirrus textures.. 

I found using Real Weather settings is really brutal if there is a lot of overcast.  Ive been using Random weather and then tweaking like adding a nice cirrus layer.  Turning off HDR is the only thing that makes this gross overcast look slight better, but I still get massive FPS drops.  I just avoid flying in this type of weather.  If you want to do IFR and fly with no vis, might as well just disable SMP for that flight.

 

This was my first flight with SMP and what got me so excited about it.  Many more pictures to come I promise :)

 

 

Culiacan to Manzanillo at 33 000 with the 727.  SkyMaxx is really impressive when you get it tweaked right.

Hey AtomicFrog what shadow and Aliasing settings do you use?  Those exterior shots of the C90 are really slick

 

9O8essFl.jpg

1TgIeN9l.jpg

peNMz12l.jpg

2q4VpGxl.jpg

 

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad you like the shots! Not sure if I have said this yet.. but all the shots so far have been using the Tropical Paradise colour set.

 

Umm, mostly overlay settings.  Ive still been experimenting.. I cant tell how much of an FPS hit the shadows take.  Its mostly OSM buildings and flying very close to big clouds that sucks frames(which is weird, why is drawing a blank grey texture so taxing?).  Trying to find a balance that works in good and bad weather has been my goal.  I still cant decide if using Extreme textures is bad or not.. I have a 4gb card so I have plenty of VRAM left over..but would my card be working harder to smooth those higher reso textures? 

 

Edit: Anything you guys would like to me to try and get some shots of? Bad weather? Certain planes or airports?  Right now Im just doin random altitudes, time and weather lookin for those sweet shots.

Edited by canox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey,

when i saw thoose shots i said WOW!

Could you please post a picture inside a vc of a "heavy addon aircraft",above of a heavy area (big city or somthing) with thoose clouds,at about 3000ft?

I really want to see how much FPS this card can give with this kind of mix situations,as im planning to buy a new PC soon so I want to compare it to other cards :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, Ive got some good VC shots from the Q400 over Zurich.  Give me some time to upload them.  

Any cities you'd like to see? Anything but Paris... its too big and all the OSM buildings are a killer.

 

Edit: Would you want to see the Jetstream? its the most taxing VC i have

Edited by canox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright heres what and where we were flying, Q400 over the Zurich area with OSM buildings. HDR 2x. I have objects set to 'A lot' and roads to 'Tons'.. no cars.

Cloud detail 50%, draw distance 100%, no god rays. med textures.

 

You said 3000 in your post so were low.. hope you didnt mean 30 000 aha

 

Edit: FYI I switched to the True Blue colour set for these pics.

 

v9iIiAJl.png

10 000 feet

UiICiVBl.png

A little bit of weather!

a4WDv1Rl.png

bR4PXFQl.png

Right through a cloud

54qkcuXl.png

CssvXmnl.png

No problems on approach.. except my heading lol

3uOqBAhl.png

Edited by canox
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, with the setup I have you will get pretty stable rates all the time when using 2x.  Any overcast layer though just kills it, no matter how much I dial down all the settings.  Something seems up with the cumulus overcast layer.  More pictures comin...

 

I agree I went back to tropical paradise colours :)

Edited by canox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its set to medium.. but I put the overcast at like 5000 when I was up at 30 000.. couldnt even see any clouds down there and my FPS was still 20.  Even with mass amounts of broken or scattered cumulus its always fine, as soon as I add any type of overcast it plummets.  Even the stratus layer where its completely grey doesnt drop my fps.

With low overcast I get that flat white thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...