Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I tested in 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 (native for my monitor). The test was performed at Wilmington at daytime, using "scattered clouds" preset from the loading screen, using the latest CRJ 200 in X-Plane 64-bit. I loaded Wilmington RWY 06 3 miles out and performed a landing and taxi to gate. I set Fraps to benchmark for 2 minutes.

 

Here's my benchmark results, and my render settings.

post-171-0-39123600-1375104806_thumb.jpg

1920x1080 WITH MODIFIED INSPECTOR SETTINGS FROM iomagicoFrames: 3413 - Time: 120000ms - Avg: 28.442 - Min: 21 - Max: 301920x1080 DEFAULT INSPECTOR SETTINGSFrames: 3611 - Time: 120000ms - Avg: 30.092 - Min: 22 - Max: 322560x1440 WITH MODIFIED INSPECTOR SETTINGS FROM iomagicoFrames: 2478 - Time: 120000ms - Avg: 20.650 - Min: 15 - Max: 222560x1440 DEFAULT INSPECTOR SETTINGSFrames: 2728 - Time: 120000ms - Avg: 22.733 - Min: 18 - Max: 24

I didn't notice much in-sim, but looking at the numbers I won't mess with the Inspector settings on my rig. This might behave different on your rigs of course.

Edited by OlaHaldor
Posted

That looks good ;-)

 

What kills everything is clouds and AA ( and shadows a bit ... )

 

All very good computer can run max objects, trees, roads and vehicles without issues.

 

The problem I have, maybe you can help, is that I got 32 GB 2400 MHz Ram, but they are recognized on Win 7 64Bit as 1140 MHz ... same with the GTX Titan Amp ! of  6GB, only 4095 Mb are seen ( and used ) by windows ... I don't want to overclock it, just get the default specs ..
 

Posted

I'm not sure I can help you out with that. I'm not so insanely skilled in such details. I think you should contact the shop or possibly the manufacturers of the different parts, unless someone on this forum can answer.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

...I truly think X-Plane isn't optimised, it's not the most beautiful software I've seen ( yet it's truly impressive ), so I don't see why no PC on earth can run it at max, like all other apps ...

Read this, these are my findings after taking a look at what X-Plane does with openGL.

 

PhM

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Read this, these are my findings after taking a look at what X-Plane does with openGL.

 

PhM

 

Yes ! Even if I don't get everything, I think the global idea is that it is tremendously UN-optimised ... Aïe aïe ... for a sim that pretended to be " much more optimized " than XP9 during its development ...

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

Yeah ...

 

Though I'm looking forward what was just revealed ... the AMD RADEON R9 290X

 

http://www.techspot.com/news/54124-amd-reveals-the-radeon-r9-290x-their-next-generation-gpu.html

 

I don't know if it's single or bi-GPU ... but hey, when X-Plane will take advantage of bi-GPU stuff ?

 

I took the Titan as I knew X-Plane was only taking power from single GPU now ... or I would have taken the older 690 !

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...