Hueyman Posted July 29, 2013 Author Report Posted July 29, 2013 Here is the render settings and the various results Quote
OlaHaldor Posted July 29, 2013 Report Posted July 29, 2013 (edited) I tested in 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 (native for my monitor). The test was performed at Wilmington at daytime, using "scattered clouds" preset from the loading screen, using the latest CRJ 200 in X-Plane 64-bit. I loaded Wilmington RWY 06 3 miles out and performed a landing and taxi to gate. I set Fraps to benchmark for 2 minutes. Here's my benchmark results, and my render settings.1920x1080 WITH MODIFIED INSPECTOR SETTINGS FROM iomagicoFrames: 3413 - Time: 120000ms - Avg: 28.442 - Min: 21 - Max: 301920x1080 DEFAULT INSPECTOR SETTINGSFrames: 3611 - Time: 120000ms - Avg: 30.092 - Min: 22 - Max: 322560x1440 WITH MODIFIED INSPECTOR SETTINGS FROM iomagicoFrames: 2478 - Time: 120000ms - Avg: 20.650 - Min: 15 - Max: 222560x1440 DEFAULT INSPECTOR SETTINGSFrames: 2728 - Time: 120000ms - Avg: 22.733 - Min: 18 - Max: 24I didn't notice much in-sim, but looking at the numbers I won't mess with the Inspector settings on my rig. This might behave different on your rigs of course. Edited July 29, 2013 by OlaHaldor Quote
Hueyman Posted July 29, 2013 Author Report Posted July 29, 2013 That looks good ;-) What kills everything is clouds and AA ( and shadows a bit ... ) All very good computer can run max objects, trees, roads and vehicles without issues. The problem I have, maybe you can help, is that I got 32 GB 2400 MHz Ram, but they are recognized on Win 7 64Bit as 1140 MHz ... same with the GTX Titan Amp ! of 6GB, only 4095 Mb are seen ( and used ) by windows ... I don't want to overclock it, just get the default specs .. Quote
OlaHaldor Posted July 29, 2013 Report Posted July 29, 2013 I'm not sure I can help you out with that. I'm not so insanely skilled in such details. I think you should contact the shop or possibly the manufacturers of the different parts, unless someone on this forum can answer. Quote
ARTIK Posted July 30, 2013 Report Posted July 30, 2013 You'll need to overclock your system to get 2400MHz. Check dog.asus.com/forum for details. http://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?27272-A-Beginner-s-Guide-To-Setting-Up-RAM-Speed&country=&status= Quote
Jim Kallinen Posted August 1, 2013 Report Posted August 1, 2013 Awesome, that is the same bios my board uses. Have the Asus Sabertooth X79. Quote
Cameron Posted August 1, 2013 Report Posted August 1, 2013 Have the Asus Sabertooth X79 Awesome board, Jim! Quote
Jim Kallinen Posted August 1, 2013 Report Posted August 1, 2013 How come I can`t like a post ? It says I have reached my quota for the day. and have not done anything. Quote
Cameron Posted August 1, 2013 Report Posted August 1, 2013 How come I can`t like a post ? It says I have reached my quota for the day. and have not done anything. Should be fixed. 1 Quote
PhM Posted August 11, 2013 Report Posted August 11, 2013 ...I truly think X-Plane isn't optimised, it's not the most beautiful software I've seen ( yet it's truly impressive ), so I don't see why no PC on earth can run it at max, like all other apps ...Read this, these are my findings after taking a look at what X-Plane does with openGL. PhM Quote
Hueyman Posted August 25, 2013 Author Report Posted August 25, 2013 Read this, these are my findings after taking a look at what X-Plane does with openGL. PhM Yes ! Even if I don't get everything, I think the global idea is that it is tremendously UN-optimised ... Aïe aïe ... for a sim that pretended to be " much more optimized " than XP9 during its development ... Quote
OlaHaldor Posted September 25, 2013 Report Posted September 25, 2013 This might be interesting for some of you ?http://forums.x-pilot.com/topic/5775-to-you-guys-asking-about-hdr-vs-non-hdr-performance/ Quote
Hueyman Posted September 25, 2013 Author Report Posted September 25, 2013 ... I'm impatient to see how the Titan handle the Saab ... I have to wait it come back from repair/exchange shop, she burned ;-( Quote
OlaHaldor Posted September 25, 2013 Report Posted September 25, 2013 (edited) If I could afford to get the Saab now, I would. But again; I think the CPU power would be the real difference. Edited September 25, 2013 by OlaHaldor Quote
Jim Kallinen Posted September 25, 2013 Report Posted September 25, 2013 No problems at all with the Saab using the Titan. 2 Quote
Hueyman Posted September 25, 2013 Author Report Posted September 25, 2013 Yeah ... Though I'm looking forward what was just revealed ... the AMD RADEON R9 290X http://www.techspot.com/news/54124-amd-reveals-the-radeon-r9-290x-their-next-generation-gpu.html I don't know if it's single or bi-GPU ... but hey, when X-Plane will take advantage of bi-GPU stuff ? I took the Titan as I knew X-Plane was only taking power from single GPU now ... or I would have taken the older 690 ! Quote
PhM Posted September 25, 2013 Report Posted September 25, 2013 ... but hey, when X-Plane will take advantage of bi-GPU stuff ?...By this time this board will be outdated . PhM 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.