Sgt R Lee Ermey Posted January 28, 2013 Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 (edited) Anyone know of any purchased planes that we know for sure that is fully functional with the latest beta (soon to be 10.20)? I'll add the list here as we find out which ones are ready 64 bit compatible aircraft. --X-Aviation - http://www.x-aviation.com/catalogJetstream 32 (I'm buying this one it looks awesome)MentorSeaMaxBlackshape PrimeCessna 152DuchessSundownerCRJ (SOON) Aerosoft/McPhat Studios - http://www.mcphatstudios.net/ATR72-500 EADT - http://www.eadt.eu/i...t-for-x-plane-9Freeware x737 project Benedikt Stratmann and Pierre Stone Peters Aircraft http://www.petersaircraft.com/A380 is now 64 bit. Jason Chandler's aircraft at http://www.c74.net/xplane/ Shade Tree Micro Aviation http://www.shadetreemicro.com/projects.shtmlHuskyBeaverOtterSuper Cub Edited February 28, 2013 by Sgt R Lee Ermey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cameron Posted January 28, 2013 Report Share Posted January 28, 2013 The Jetstream 32, Mentor, SeaMax, Blackshape Prime, Cessna 152, Duchess, and Sundowner at X-Aviation. Soon the CRJ. I believe on the org, the CRJ and 727. Not sure if there are others. Anything non-plugin related of course, so I'm sure there are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daac Posted January 29, 2013 Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 I'll add the ATR72-500 from Aerosoft/McPhat Studios works in 64 bit XP10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetted Area Posted January 29, 2013 Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 Try PA Peters as well. All part 121 airframes and they declare 64 comp. Carenado also declares 64 comp with several part 91 aircraft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve31000 Posted January 29, 2013 Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 I made the mistake of believing the A320 Neo by Jar Design was 64 bit ready and purchased it last Sunday only to be disappointed. I can of course fly in 32 bit but miss the performance of 64 bit. I have to say that it is confusing to keep up with what is compatible and what is not. Roll on the end of this beta period so all of this can be cleared up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt R Lee Ermey Posted January 29, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 Not familiar with PA peters can you clarify? I just need the author and plane that is compatible or website so I can check. I want to have a nice list here with a link to each manufacturer even freely distributed ones that are compatible. Makes a quick and easy reference for us to go to shop once 10.20 is out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horani Posted January 29, 2013 Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 I made the mistake of believing the A320 Neo by Jar Design was 64 bit ready and purchased it last Sunday only to be disappointed. I can of course fly in 32 bit but miss the performance of 64 bit. I have to say that it is confusing to keep up with what is compatible and what is not. Roll on the end of this beta period so all of this can be cleared up. A320Neo by JARDesign is 64-bit ready. Look for their 64bit beta update. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryCYUL Posted January 29, 2013 Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 A320Neo by JARDesign is 64-bit ready. Look for their 64bit beta update.just for mac users not windows Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt R Lee Ermey Posted January 29, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 Hey Cameron any news on whether Cessna Corvalis TT will be updated soon too? That is another one I want to get from you. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scubajuan_new Posted January 29, 2013 Report Share Posted January 29, 2013 Freware x737 project by EADT Benedikt Stratmann and Pierre Stonehttp://www.eadt.eu/index.php?aircraft-for-x-plane-9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Smith Posted January 31, 2013 Report Share Posted January 31, 2013 Are you guys sure, Jetstream 32 is good to go for 64bit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cameron Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 Are you guys sure, Jetstream 32 is good to go for 64bit? 100% sure. We are the distributor of it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Smith Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 thanks for the quick reply, you have a sale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve31000 Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 just for mac users not windowsI really wish they would release the beta for windows especially considering the windows version was released well before the Mac version. Hopefully it will happen soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scubajuan_new Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 Try PA Peters as well. All part 121 airframes and they declare 64 comp. Carenado also declares 64 comp with several part 91 aircraft. PA A321 is not 64bit compatible yet. I don't know if the A380 and his previous planes for XP 9 are, I doubt it. I think his priority is with the ones released for XP 10. Not familiar with PA peters can you clarify? I just need the author and plane that is compatible or website so I can check. I want to have a nice list here with a link to each manufacturer even freely distributed ones that are compatible. Makes a quick and easy reference for us to go to shop once 10.20 is out. http://www.petersaircraft.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt R Lee Ermey Posted February 1, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 Oh sorry Peters Aircraft ok I'll add to list once I find out which ones are compatible. I'm just not familiar with the "part 121/91" difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scubajuan_new Posted February 1, 2013 Report Share Posted February 1, 2013 Me neither, I don't know what that means. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twgin Posted February 2, 2013 Report Share Posted February 2, 2013 General Operating and Flight Rules (14 CFR Part 91) is a section of the US Federal Aviation Regulations covering (guess what) general operating and flight rules for aircraft flown in the USA. Private Pilot activities fall under Part 91. Part 121 is another section of the same FAR covering scheduled air carriers. Parts 91 and 121 do not define aircraft but rather the regulations that they are operated under (a scheduled airline service under Part 121 has stricter regulations that your run of the mill VFR general aviation pilot operating under Part 91). A private pilot flying a Baron would fall under Part 91, a scheduled service flying a Baron would fall under Part 121. This can be a mind numbing topic (lets get into Part 135, Commuter and On Demand services !), but in general referring to airplanes as "part 91" or "part 121" is not quite correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetted Area Posted February 3, 2013 Report Share Posted February 3, 2013 Oh sorry Peters Aircraft ok I'll add to list once I find out which ones are compatible. I'm just not familiar with the "part 121/91" difference. Yes, Peters Aircraft. That's what I was referring to. FAA Part 121 operations typically references "Commercial Airliner" type/category aircraft. FAA Part 91, typically references "General Aviation" type/category aircraft. Sorry, for the confusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetted Area Posted February 3, 2013 Report Share Posted February 3, 2013 (edited) This can be a mind numbing topic (lets get into Part 135, Commuter and On Demand services !), but in general referring to airplanes as "part 91" or "part 121" is not quite correct. If one has ever worked in aviation then referring to a Part 121 operation has a very specific connotation with respect to aircraft type/category. The same holds true for flight training, where operations are very often referred to as being either a Part 141, or Part 61 - again, having a specific connotation with respect to type and kind of flight school and/or flight training program. Others, will also recognize the term a Part 135 operation, but that can have a broader meaning in relationship to type/category of aircraft used. One might find a Boeing 757 sitting on the same ramp next to a PA-28R, with both belonging to a Part 135 operation. In general, it might depend on ones' background as to whether or not such references are familiar, or unfamiliar. I still remember what the Fuel Load sheets looked like at an aircraft refueling company I worked at as a kid in school. Each account had the name of the customer along with the FAA Part number designating the type of flight operation and the type of aircraft to be fueled. I could have said General Aviation aircraft in one instance as opposed to Part 91, but for some people that's still somewhat cryptic. So, it might depend on what you've been exposed to in the past. Edited February 3, 2013 by Wetted Area Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt R Lee Ermey Posted February 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2013 Oooh banned. Useful answer though. Maybe he if wasn't so pompous on that other thread he'd be around to accept my thanks heh. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MugHug Posted February 18, 2013 Report Share Posted February 18, 2013 (edited) Jason Chandler's aircraft at AIR.C74.Net work fine under 64-bit as none of them depend on plugins.Grumman G21-A Goose Package and the Bombardier Challenger 300 Captain Edition by Ddenn Designs using the standard SASL 64-bit plugin.STMAs Husky, Beaver, Otter and Super Cub are now 64-bit. The Pilatus is still not fully 64-bit compatible.Regards Edited February 18, 2013 by MugHug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt R Lee Ermey Posted February 18, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2013 Does Ddenn have their own site to sell their aircraft? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MugHug Posted February 18, 2013 Report Share Posted February 18, 2013 Does Ddenn have their own site to sell their aircraft? I have, so far been unable to confirm that. Not sure if it is good to advertist X-Plane.org, but that is where I normally see his items for sale. SimMarket do not list his items. Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt R Lee Ermey Posted February 19, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 Thanks I'll add to list, but I won't be adding anything to the list that the is exclusive to the cesspool of tyranny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.