Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Example, for an OAT of +5°C:

  • assumed temperature of +45°C already gives apparent "maximum reduction" for FLEX (N1 target 85.0%)
  • increasing the assumed temperature to +50°C gives the same N1 target of 85.0% as the above…
    • but V-speeds (here, V1) and especially required takeoff distance differ:

test.thumb.jpg.aaecbdba8d912fbd1229cbf6040c975c.jpg

…that over 100m of runway, which seems like a lot if it were caused by e.g. rounding (say, N1 target of 85.04% at FLEX 45 vs. 84.96% at FLEX 50)?

It kind of looks like, possibly, the assumed temperature of +50°C initially results in an N1 target lower than 85.0 which then gets sanitized to a minimum target, but TOFL and V-speeds are based on the invisible, unbounded N1 target instead?

Regards,

Tim

@Graeme_77

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...