Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Jan and Jon,

I too experienced a couple of crashes like the one described above and -- erroneously, it would seem -- suspected database inconsistencies to cause those. Yesterday I performed a flight from Linz (LOWL, my home base in real life) to Kefalonia (LGKF). Wary about inconsistencies between the 737 database (still AIRAC 1509 in my 737) and X-Plane (AIRAC 1603 on my system) I proceeded from Brindisi VOR direct to Kefalonia VOR, selected a VOR approach on RWY 32 *without selecting a STAR*, then shortened the "approach" on the LEGS page by making the actual RWY waypoint the next one after KFN VOR, and was able to perform the VOR approach and landing, using HDG select to track the appropriate  VOR radials and V/S for descent, and finally hand-flying and landing the 737, without any issues.

Happy landings

Sigmar

Posted

Hi Sigmar,

yes, it is perfectly possible to work around the problem by substituting a regular approach and then modifying it... or just disregard the magenta line in the end - after all you are going for a visual approach - this does not mean keeping visual with your EHSI :P.

Of course we need to fix the core fault.

Jan

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...