Japo32

If you have programmed the FMS and you show the LEGS page in it.. please don't do it.. In low computers there is lot of shuttering. So for example choose the index page in the fms.. and you can see the following points in the MFD. That way you will have less shuttering.

Please tell someone to translate it into good spanish or good english because I didn't understand anything.

With the second question, yes for now it is too sensitive but it also round the data input. We will try to fix it in future. The first question I don't understand it.

Trully we haven't spoken about dates in Laminar about xp10 out. The only thing clear is release this year in less time possible. Now we are joining thing together and tunning stuff. Cannot say a date, because as you all know Laminar always like to sell the product in Beta late stages, and we are close to that.

I am flying some ivao flights with the CRJ200 these days.. because I also want to enjoy it. And believe me I usually don't use the games or creations I have worked, because I hate them, by the time and effort I had to put in them.. But in this case, it is great to fly the CRJ200.. BUT still want to make it better. I would like to introduce a failure system in it, as well as increase the FMC.. BUT those are things that are in my mind.. and believe me that are not easy to put in reality. All depends in what future brings. I cannot bring those funcionabilities alone. Philipp want to increase the plane, but we have to see what we can do with it. September will say. Pd: here the flight I made tonight..

It is simulated. I have tested it in Ivao.. and it works. Please read the manual. It is a button labeled in the radio panel.

Not sure it wasn't implemented. Has to checkout... anyway we pretend to continue development and upgrade in September. My plans are to upgrade the Fms functions, but I cannot promise anything.

Don't you mean left panel? That knob as others is driven by custom dataref. You can see a list of all in the old support 1.0 forum. So with a plugin that can control custom datarefs changes with keyboard strokes. I believe that plugin is inside the org.

please report the issue to x-aviation. It is an installation problem and they will help you for sure. Cameron? please can you point him to the right link? thanks!

well I think the use of external FMC has to be unswered by Philipp... So lets wait him and lets see what he has to say about it..

Well.. the datarefs that are inside the list are the ones we use to make animation and input of data inside the FMC. I will contact with Philipp to tell you this information if it is possible to share it and you can use it.

This has to be answered by Philipp.. but I believe you cannot resize the screens, because elements inside the displays are positioned by coordinates. But maybe I am wrong.

Laminar has not to upgrade the systems it has already. It is so complicated to do the systems of a plane, imagine to complete a whole simulator. The focus is the simulator. The main base. Then vendors have the posibility to raise the bar. Even FSX doesn't have a fmc like xplane already has in xplane9, but look how good are the vendors FMC's. We provide a guide of what it can be done in x-plane to vendors. external companies has to continue the work. But with this 747 I trick some minor systems.... making a little of programming. So little... so to start engines people have to follow a little the procedures of the real plane. Minor systems simulation there.

Thiengo, we will continue with the development of the CRJ200 making upgrades of it when we are rested enough from the big storm it has been release this plane. But I consider it is good enough and with enough systems to enjoy for looooooooong time. I know you consider it still needs lots of systems to implement but in my consideration we succeded in one this I was personally searching with the plane. The joy and sensation to fly it with an internal FMC modifying routes and making holdings. As said, we will upgrade it when we have the time and the force to do it. Right now with the born of my son and the great effort it has been release the plane and make the support to have an stable copy of the CRJ, I will have the vacations that still didn't have in August. Later I will see if we create another plane at the same time we upgrade the CRJ, because the main work upgrading it is programming and remember I am a 3D artist, so both things can be done same time. What I am not going to do is start a big project that needs programming without help. The CRJ200 is selling good but still it needs more to save the time worked. X-Plane is far away from the number of sellings in FSX even with higher prices.

Great!! Well I trully understand you Tom... Kids, XP10... mmmm familiar to me!! hehe.

Well Philipp should unswer this one, but the only way I know showing the fms in a second monitor with same computer, is extending xplane to that second monitor, because is not possible right now to undock the screens out from x-plane main program

Well, vasfmc is used in the CRJ already, so I don't understand your question.

Yaw dampers connection are not illuminated in 1.1 version. Take a look on that.

So you moved the plane in other folder? If yiu do, you will break it and won't be able to fly it. Please don't change anything. Thanks

Well I am going to repeat here thet if this CRJ would have AT, it would break all the fun it has. I know in real life exist all automatic systems possible so they make easier pilot life, but we sim-pilots search for challenges, so if someone doesn't feel confortable with the way throttle has to be managed, then I would recomend him/her to first train in easier planes.

Inside plane maker you can set the ammount of energy the landing lights emit. There you can reduce them and also reduce the radious of th landing light cone, so it will affect less the cockpit.

I think TOBS can inform you better than me about it.

Well.. the cirrus is not the proper aircraft to compare with. But not knowing your video card, your CPU is low speed. 2.27Ghz is not enough for this plane... and also you only have 4Mb ram. Considering that a good videocard would do a better job... but if you don't have a good one.......

Ok.. good! another one solved!

bah... that will be very easy. Don't worry.