Jump to content

FlorianR

Members
  • Posts

    266
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FlorianR

  1. Read the manual, it tells you where to get it .
  2. Back on topic: The model looks great, and I can't wait to see it finished !
  3. While Javier's models may be great, I don't think anyone makes better system simulation and flight models than Peter Hager. Yes, the visuals on the A330/A340 are outdated but isn't flight realism the most important aspect of a flight simulator?
  4. It's terrible on Mac's.
  5. Ah, looks like Ben beat me to it. Thanks for the link
  6. I found this video on youtube today, and was rather amazed. How cool would it be to see this in future versions of X-Plane? Just wondering how many terrabites of hard drive space i will need to store all that information . Cheers, FlorianR
  7. Wow, the buildings look great! Not sure where you could get nice textures for them though...you might just have to make your own.
  8. Yes, but my comment was not meant to be compliment. I implied that the rest of the scenery looks awful.
  9. FlorianR

    Chek Lap Kok!!!

    very nice video and music! i really enjoyed it .
  10. The best part of the scenery are the static aircraft :-\
  11. Wow, looks really good! So are these just textures that overlay an area or a replacement for the default water textures. The reason I am asking is if they will be animated and will be seen not only in SOCAL. Cheers
  12. Very nice! But how do they look from high altitudes?
  13. great news!
  14. Great, it really does look fun! What are your system specs and fps?
  15. Ddenn´s Challenger 300 has now been released on the .org. Looks like a fantastic model with meticulous details, but I´m a little worried about the FPS you´ll get with it. Also, .org customer support is atrocious. Any thoughts and first impressions? Cheers http://store01.prostores.com/servlet/x-planestore/Detail?no=290 ps. Cameron, any chance of seeing this plane at X-Aviation?
  16. Well, the planemaker model and airfoil design may be off. But good question, I'd love to hear some developers answers!
  17. My thoughts are with you and everyone affected by this shocking event. Its disgusting that the killer will only get a maximum of 21 years in prison. 21 years of torture, it should be.
  18. Is it FPS friendly? 15-20% better than Dan's Erj140 or the SSJ100, according to Ddenn.
  19. Jersey peaked near 100 today also. Thank god I'm going back to Berlin tomorrow - 70 degrees and rain. I guess you can't have it all
  20. The visuals are very appealng, and judging from his other planes the flightmodel will be the same. X-Plane really needs some high- quality Biz jets, and this looks like a great start. Will most likely buy it, if my MacBook can handle it .
  21. http://www.boeing.com/Features/2011/07/bca_737_gigaplane_07_18_11.html Looks like great news for aircraft developers! Tell me what you think
  22. and what makes you think I didn't write the author of the picture an e-mail asking him for permission to modify and repost?
  23. First off, I wasn't sure whether to post this in the review section of the forum or here, since it is not an X-Plane review. If one of the moderators feels it is in the wrong place, please move the topic I have wanted to do a review on the application for a while, but have always been too lazy. Now, after the developers released a major graphics and physics update, and I felt obliged to share. The application I am talking about is called F-SIM Space Shuttle, and can be bought in the Apple App Store for only $.99! The application is space shuttle re-entry simulator. You take command of the Atlantis Space Shuttle are guided to either Kennedy Space Center or Edwards Air Force Base. After the landing, a highly detailed summary is presented to you, with a rating of your landing. I have broken the review down into several categories: Graphics: After the recently published free update, I doubt you can find better graphics in any flight simulation application on the App Store. With the app comes a fully animated and detailed 3D model of the Atlantis Space Shuttle. In addition, a 3D virtual cockpit with a working HUD can be chosen as one of the many views. The ground textures around the airport are taken from satellite images, and look very realistic from high altitudes, but somewhat blurry close to the ground. Clouds, sun glare, and sky/night colors look phenomenal. Runway textures are not taken from satellite images, and therefore look very crisp and sharp. Lastly, visual aids such as the PAPI and ball/bar are present and functioning. Flight Model/Realism: Since I have very little experience flying real Space Shuttles, and cannot say how accurate the flight model is, only how accurate it feels to me. And it feels very realistic to me! The controls are very stable and the whole simulation doesn't feel like you are flying an RC plane. Quoting the developer, the "flight dynamics model is very accurate". But what makes this app even more fun is that a controller guides all the way from 50,000 feet down to the ground. Follow his advice, don't take your eyes of the 3D HUD, and you'll do just fine . Options: When you open up the App from your I-device, you have an overwhelming amount of options to choose from! Let’s break that down: First, choose whether you wish to do a full approach (approaching the HAC) or just a final. Then select what site you want to land at, Kennedy Space Center or Edwards AFB. Lastly, choose the runway. Next you, you can customize the weather conditions such as night/day and clear/overcast. You can slide visibility from 5nm to 25 nm, and trust me, leave it near 25 at first ! If you click on the wind arrow, you have the option to select you wind speed, gust, turbulence, temperature, and Atm. pressure (at sea level). And something that was recently added in the update - Failures! You can now select the following things to fail during your approach: approach guidance, HUD, speed brake, and hydraulics. Or, if that is all a bit too much, click on quick flight . After Landing Analysis: After your landing, click on the analysis window and you will see a long list of data - the landing analysis, which gives you information ranging from approach precision (in %) to weight acting on each landing gear. A pretty neat feature! Conclusion: I would absolutely recommend this application to any flight enthusiasts. And for only $.99, you get way more than you can expect. The graphics are detailed, the controls are smooth and feel realistic. The only two minor things that bother me a little bit are the resolution of ground textures and the 3d cockpit. The cockpit may be 3D, but the display and buttons are mostly 2D and not animated, with the exception of the HUD. Special Features: -replay mode -6 different view points (including chase view where you can toggle around) -failures -autoland demo -A very good manual -G-Force shaking -and many many more! I hope you enjoyed reading this review! My apologies if it was a bit informal and brief; this is my first review ever. Cheers
  24. Thanks for the suggestion Perry, but the contrast of the blue ocean and red sunset is a little hard to do color correction on. Maybe I will give it another shot sometime soon. Until then, here is another picture of the sunset series for our heli-lovers . I did a little more than just color correction on this one. Lets see who can spot everything; there are two things besides CC! original: http://www.wallpaperzzz.com/wallpapers/hd/hires/boeing-ah64-apache.jpg
  25. Hmm, I don't think I can enlarge the images to a size that would look good on a desktop without the images getting pixelated and grainy. I will try working with larger image sizes from now on!
×
×
  • Create New...