Peter T. Posted October 14, 2012 Report Posted October 14, 2012 (edited) i decided, after all my posts and updates on X-KMDW less and less people are getting interested and tuned to the updates, probably because there is already a good KMDW out there by Butnaru so I'll let you guys decide what airport should we do next so to suit your wants. Edited October 16, 2012 by Peter T. 1 Quote
Redfisher Posted October 14, 2012 Report Posted October 14, 2012 How can you tell that "less and less people" are interested in KMDW? Quote
Peter T. Posted October 14, 2012 Author Report Posted October 14, 2012 Well... the topic seemed to be more quieter than usual, most of the post now is my updates...so i presumed theres no much interest anymore, of course i will continue to develop KMDW, but i think KMDW is not the best choice because of Butnaru's great KMDW already out there and I'm just re-inventing the wheel... Quote
Peter T. Posted October 14, 2012 Author Report Posted October 14, 2012 oh and if you people dont like either of those then feel free to post what airport you like to be made... and I will add them up top. Quote
john82088 Posted October 14, 2012 Report Posted October 14, 2012 I continue to follow your work even though I am not posting anything and I am sure others are also.John Quote
skiflyzander Posted October 14, 2012 Report Posted October 14, 2012 (edited) Denver BTW... I am really looking forward to your KMDW file! I am following the thread closely Edited October 14, 2012 by skiflyzander Quote
greggerm Posted October 14, 2012 Report Posted October 14, 2012 Remember - with more updates comes more familiarity with them, The news of your continued development becomes expected rather than properly appreciated. Fewer updates at wider intervals might do a better job at teasing the user base, and help maintain interest in the process.I'm sure everyone who's interested is still viewing and enjoying the updates provided, but with so many updates happening, it becomes a more passive event.Hang back on the next (2) updates you would normally have provided, and then wow everyone with the 3rd. Quote
Peter T. Posted October 15, 2012 Author Report Posted October 15, 2012 i see, alright well then....the next preview will be something special Quote
Jordan P. Posted October 15, 2012 Report Posted October 15, 2012 I think Luton! It is near me! When will you count the votes? Quote
scubajuan_new Posted November 21, 2012 Report Posted November 21, 2012 I understan that creating a scenery from scratch is a lengthy process that requires a considerable amount of time and dedication, first on the research and then in the development it self. I've noticed that sceneries are usually released as a single aerodrome or airport and that most developers concentrate in one single airport at the time and usually a major hub, like KJFK, KLAX, etc. Which makes sense to me since small aerodromes are only popular for people that either live in the area and want to to fly locally or for someone that has visited the place and want to recreate a trip; but how about a series of the most difficult or dangerous airports in the world.For a while I have been looking for converted from MSFS or even native files to convert to XP of the known 10 most weird or dangerous airports to land, and I've found some but not all. in XP9 Lukla was possible to land at but in XP10 with the rwy follows the contour... is just impossible, there are some sharp edges on the runway. It is not even possible to start at the runway without crashing, which is a bummer. I remember last years or perhaps 2 years ago there was an attempt to make an online fly-in and the route was from Katmandu to lukla. It was a lot of fun and quite challenging.I guess my suggestion is that: To make a series of airports/aerodromes of the most difficult or dangerous airports in the world: http://www.squidoo.com/weird-airports 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.