Michael_Chang Posted September 27, 2012 Author Report Posted September 27, 2012 Gracias Michael.Trust me, i never wanted to belittle your group, it's a good group, and there is tonnes of potential 1 Quote
Peter T. Posted September 27, 2012 Report Posted September 27, 2012 not trying to insult anyone okay?but XPP and samne also converts aircraft from Thomas Ruth....so arent they also Mr/Ms. CRTL+C?also, this problem also happened to me. i pointed out some errors, and then in the next reply there's a nuclear war going on. Quote
Jordan P. Posted September 27, 2012 Report Posted September 27, 2012 First off Peter they got premission for ALL of their planes! Also Michael a couple of things if you tell everyone what is bad in the plane than a lot of people won't want it! And how would you like to be talked sales away. Secondly I think it is a great idea to do reviews but how far in depth you go into the good things also go that far into the good thinks and try not be as harsh you yourself said you were mean! Quote
Peter T. Posted September 27, 2012 Report Posted September 27, 2012 well to tell you, FSXP also got permission for ALL their planes too. the illegal conversions isn't FSXP's and Michael old projects. and that was AGES ago, please don't be so outdated. as for the other facts, it depends on the type of person. when he himself said he is mean, i think he means that he think everyone over here thinks him in a negative way and looks down upon. I'm not on anyone's side, im just expressing my opinion i also think Michael is a little strong on his language etc, but his intentions weren't to insult anyone..... Quote
Peter T. Posted October 5, 2012 Report Posted October 5, 2012 Looking good! Just go easy on the polys also the top view shows that the nose is more rounded then it should be, I THINK that the shape should be more thinner and pointy (just a bit) Quote
Carlos Garcia Posted October 5, 2012 Report Posted October 5, 2012 (edited) Edit : same Post... Edited October 5, 2012 by Carlos Garcia Quote
Peter T. Posted October 6, 2012 Report Posted October 6, 2012 no i mean if you look at the top of the nose the shaper should be more pointy, or maybe im worng....actually i am wrong Quote
Ricardo Bolognini Posted October 6, 2012 Report Posted October 6, 2012 no i mean if you look at the top of the nose the shaper should be more pointy, or maybe im worng....actually i am wrong You are confused by the E-190/195 that has it nose longer then E-170 Quote
maple-syrup Posted October 6, 2012 Report Posted October 6, 2012 Please fix the shape and size of the winglets... They look like they were taken off of a 737NG and taped on! Btw lovely just wonderful plane. Quote
Peter T. Posted October 6, 2012 Report Posted October 6, 2012 if you do all what michael said then it will be the bee's knees! Quote
Michael_Chang Posted October 6, 2012 Author Report Posted October 6, 2012 is the wingbox actually attached to the fuselage? or is it a separate body? Quote
Ricardo Bolognini Posted October 7, 2012 Report Posted October 7, 2012 is the wingbox actually attached to the fuselage? or is it a separate body?The wing box you said , you mean the Belly? Quote
Michael_Chang Posted October 7, 2012 Author Report Posted October 7, 2012 like, the fairing that joins the wing and fuselage, the bulge Quote
Jordan P. Posted October 7, 2012 Report Posted October 7, 2012 Or as I call it the undercarriage Quote
Ryan M. Posted October 23, 2012 Report Posted October 23, 2012 I agree with michael. 30 dollars is overpriced, especially if i can get one that half as good for free. Quote
HarryCYUL Posted May 2, 2013 Report Posted May 2, 2013 Aren't Michaels freeware planes only 2D and very low quality, why is he bashing SSG's masterpiece. The 170 and 190 are amazing compared to all the 2D crap for download on the internet. Quote
john82088 Posted May 2, 2013 Report Posted May 2, 2013 The updated e-170 is a good plane. Very pleased with it for the cost. John 2 Quote
Peter T. Posted May 3, 2013 Report Posted May 3, 2013 Aren't Michaels freeware planes only 2D and very low quality, why is he bashing SSG's masterpiece. The 170 and 190 are amazing compared to all the 2D crap for download on the internet.Yes our planes are very low quality... And thousands of people downloaded FSXP planes... He wasn't bashing the planes, he is criticizing the flaws made before the update, which SSG has now mostly fixed. There is a difference between bashing and criticizing. 1 Quote
Ryan M. Posted May 3, 2013 Report Posted May 3, 2013 Aren't Michaels freeware planes only 2D and very low quality, why is he bashing SSG's masterpiece. The 170 and 190 are amazing compared to all the 2D crap for download on the internet.masterpiece? Not even. It's good, but not that good. Quote
Michael_Chang Posted May 3, 2013 Author Report Posted May 3, 2013 Aren't Michaels freeware planes only 2D and very low quality, why is he bashing SSG's masterpiece. The 170 and 190 are amazing compared to all the 2D crap for download on the internet. don't ask a question. figure out for yourself the planes are ready to try, and i'll be the first to admit the panels on my 767's suck. 1 Quote
howardthepilot1999 Posted May 3, 2013 Report Posted May 3, 2013 Surprisingly, I actually like Michael's 767 a lot, except for the panel texture. Flightmodel is excellent btw, just need that ART STAB to be fixed. 1 Quote
oregonboy109 Posted May 3, 2013 Report Posted May 3, 2013 The updated e-170 is a good plane. Very pleased with it for the cost.JohnI completely agree and the update addresses many of the "issues" referred to by Michael. Great plane Quote
TheSlasher Posted November 17, 2013 Report Posted November 17, 2013 Thinking of getting myself a copy of the E170 or E-190. But I'm not sure, I'm looking,also, at the dash8 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.