Bulat
-
Posts
24 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Latest X-Plane & Community News
Events
Downloads
Store
Posts posted by Bulat
-
-
Thanks for the good piloting tips!
There should be no difference in the Flight path vector readings, as there can be no difference in the length of the landing gear, half-wing, etc.
The onboard processor on a live aircraft calculates the value of the Flight path vector and provides all consumers. You know that very well. But your CL650 obviously has two sources of calculations and the Flight path vector display, and from here there is a difference (I may be wrong). In my subjective opinion, HUD has more plausible data.
Do you think I have correctly justified the need for amendments, or will we continue the debate on how to pilot an airplane correctly? -
Thanks for the quick response and I now know that it is impossible to pilot by the Flight path vector pointer .
But you did not specify where it is written in the Flight Crew Operations Manual about the possible (permissible) difference in the Flight path vector readings on HUD and MFD?
-
I saw a big difference in the Flightpath vector readings on HUD and MFD. In the video, you realized that exposure to MFD Flightpath vector led to a landing to RWY. I understand that this is a minor flaw inherent in the Challenger 650 aircraft, and you are forced to repeat it. And until he is eliminated on the plane itself, will he stay on the flight simulator?
-
Hi amyinorbit! Let's clarify, in this topic we are discussing ProLine 21, which is modeled on the Hot start flight simulator SL650 ? If you called the display program "ProLine 21", this is absolutely not an argument in favor of its excellent work. Do you understand what I'm writing about?
The SID and STAR display system has shortcomings and they need to be eliminated!
In the next topic I will describe in detail one of the errors. -
ОК.
Here again there was an incident with the display of the SID "ABLO27" scheme in LGAV: after crossing the altitude (1100), the plane did not reach the specified line 2nm begins to turn. Should the plane turn around? Where to? For what course? How will the "NAV" mode work?
-
An interesting error at the EDDL airfield has been discovered. How to fix it?
-
LFPG данные ВПП.docxLFPG данные ВПП.docxLFPG данные ВПП.docxLFPG данные ВПП.docxLet's look at the drawings.
The lower figure of the LFPG airfield diagram shows that the RWY26R threshold has been moved to 1969 (ARINC data section "PG"). What did it affect? TORA TODA ASDA (You can google the abbreviation) since RWY 08L and RWY26R have not changed and are gladly used by pilots to calculate before each takeoff. And only one thing has changed: for RW26R -LDA, it decreased for landing on 1969f.
Thus, the entire surface of the concrete strip is used for take-off from both directions and for landing from one direction 08L and only one direction 26 R uses a shortened length for landing.
If I were a leading programmer, I would display on MFD all airfields within a radius of 10-15 miles in flight below 5000-3000f. The ARINC database has all this; and the computer needs one time to calculate and display for one airfield or for 5 airfields. Just imagine, after takeoff you have a fire in the plane and you need to urgently land at the nearest airfield until the cabin is filled with smoke. This is where a competent program for displaying airfields will help.
I wish you success. You will succeed and you will be praised! I apologize for the mechanical translation. But I think you understand me. -
Good afternoon Graeme_77!
It's nice to chat with you. The previous opponent uses aggressive rhetoric, constantly tries to divert the topic of conversation to the side, blurts out the essence of the issue, misleads, throws terminology and concepts that a simple person does not know. It's all read by people all over the world!
There was a corresponding RW video on YouTube fo Challenger 650! Please look at it. You will have to solve the problem with the RW projection in MFD! -
07.02.2022 в 11:53 Булат сказал:
Мой вопрос был прост: изображение RW отличается от вида за кабиной на Challenger 650.
Я не ставил вопрос о составе оборудования на самолете и реализованных технологиях, их вариантах на выпускаемых самолетах и используемой терминологии; Вы сами подняли эти проблемы и вступили в их обсуждение.
На вашей RW-проекции на МФД самолет воспринимается на высоте 40-50 футов, хотя и стоит на бетоне на высоте «0». И это очень неправильно для высокоточного авиасимулятора.
Я просто хочу помочь вам вывести ваш замечательный дорогой самолет на хороший уровень! -
-
On 2/7/2022 at 2:09 AM, Cameron said:
Вы ошибаетесь. Поведение, которое вы видите в симуляторе, является точным.
I have the right to make mistakes, I am not an expert. But when you mislead naive buyers, is this also called a mistake? Do you have problems with displaying RW on MFD and can't solve them? I was asked and I upload a clip of how RW is displayed on MFD in PHENOM and CL650. In the first case, RW fills the entire MFD space, and in CL650 it remains a narrow ribbon, as at a flight altitude of 40-50f.
-
15 hours ago, Cameron said:
Hi @Bulat,
Please stop accusing this product of being poorly tested. There have now been several instances of you making claims like this when you were actually wrong. We have tried to be kind to you in how we explain why things are the way they are, but you continue to make comments like this.
It's very clear right now that you do not know everything about the 650, and instead of learning first before accusing us of wrongdoing, you instead try and tell us we are wrong.
Here is the documentation in the Challenger manual stating that the way our 650 is programmed is correct:
Чтобы вы могли легко перевести это в переводчике, я сделаю так, чтобы вы могли скопировать и вставить: «Когда взлетно-посадочная полоса имеет смещенный порог, SVC использует фактическое местоположение порога (а не доступную зону взлета до смещенного порога) в качестве отправной точки взлетно-посадочной полосы».
Как я уже говорил ранее, X-Plane 11 правильно показывает вам область до смещенного порога.
650 также корректен, чтобы НЕ показывать вам область перед смещенным порогом.
You interpret the given position of the document on the SVC in a peculiar way and this is incorrect!
There are a lot of airfields in the world with shifted thresholds., especially in mountainous and urban areas. But, no aviation document reduces the length of the concrete part of the airfield by the amount of the displaced threshold. There are a number of important reasons for this!
You were the first to come up with the idea to finalize the world aviation order.
Your flight simulator is no longer professional, as it contains a number of gross errors and simplifications compared to the existing large aviation.
Obviously, the CL650 flight simulator should go into the category of an interesting toy for boys 10-12 years old who dream of aviation?
Or will you eliminate errors?
I will not enter into a debate on this issue until you consult with experts! -
4 hours ago, Cameron said:
Оба правильные!
В аэропорту есть смещенный порог, поэтому X-Plane 11 показывает вам это с доступной взлетной зоной.
Challenger 650 не отображает доступные зоны взлета, только начало взлетно-посадочной полосы/пороги. Соответственно, это тоже правильно.
The RW26R is displayed correctly in X-Plane 11. You have an incorrect display on the CL650 and you will need to fix it! You have a big mistake in 1969.
I am posting for you an extract from the ARINC 424 database for the LFPG airfield. Please read it and show it to the lead programmer.
They send you errors and help you test your software product for free.
CL650 you poorly tested before selling.-
1
-
-
-
When the replay is enabled, only the X-Plane 11 component is enabled for viewing. In the cockpit of the aircraft, avionics devices remain dead with readings at the time of switching on the replay.
-
AT the beginning of the RW26R at the PARIS airfield on the MFD there is no piece of concrete covering of the airfield from the beginning of the RW to the transferred threshold?
Where is correct on the MFD of the aircraft or in X-Plane11?
-
My question was simple: the picture of the RW differs from the view behind the cockpit on the Challenger 650.
I did not raise the question of the composition of the equipment on the aircraft and the technologies implemented, their options on the released aircraft and the terminology used; you yourself raised these problems and got into their discussion.
On your RW projection on MFD, the plane is perceived at an altitude of 40-50 feet, although it is standing on concrete at an altitude of "0". And this is very wrong for a high-precision flight simulator.
I just want to help you bring your wonderful expensive plane to a good level! -
On 1/30/2022 at 6:00 PM, JRBarrett said:On 2/5/2022 at 8:12 PM, Cameron said:
It was not forgotten. That is an optional add-on, and is not on all 650's from the factory. A google image search of the 650 will probably show you right away that most any 650 does not have this.
The camera is infrared for the EVS (Enhanced Vision System), and It provides images of the approach, runway lighting, and of terrain scenery that's viewed on the pilot's HUD and on the co-pilot's multi-function display.
It was considered for the add-on, but determined not something that could be implemented due to limitations in X-Plane.
Now it is clear to me that it is difficult to simulate the runway at the MFD
and this will be possible only in X-Plane 12.
But I now understand that the developers from AEROBACK for the Phenom 300 aircraft have overtaken time and made a miracle for much less money? -
Here in the nose of the CL 650 aircraft I saw some kind of camera. Does it relate to synthetic visibility equipment? Why did they forget to put it on the Hot Star CL 650?
-
There are a few questions for your wonderful aircraft:
1.Can I find out when there will be a full-fledged RW image in synthetic visibility mode on PFD?
2. Will all airfields be displayed in the field of view of synthetic visibility or only airfields from FPL?
3. Will smoke appear from under the wheels on landing?
Thanks for attention. -
18.01.2022 в 10:20 leha74ru сказал:
значит что то сделал не так. после прописывания в host проверить доступность можно просто открыв браузер и в качестве адреса указать IP (да открывать файл с правами администратора)
Все заработало! Спасибо добрый человек!
-
Статус налогового управления США CL650.pdf
09.01.2022 в 5:09, RayTheRedd сказал:
спасибо. Работает в Москве, Россия.
У меня не сработало: 206.65.196.29 navcen.uscg.gov. Не работают курсовые и виртуальная видимость.
-
The main electric locking lever (also known as the “emergency rod") cannot be moved to the upper position and the batteries cannot be turned on and start the engines
I saw a big difference in the Flightpath vector readings on HUD and MFD
in Systems and Tech
Posted
And what to do with the difference in the indications of the flight path vectors on the MFD and HUD, you did not say. Will it stay or will you fix it?
611123679_Er-rSIDSTAR.docx