POM
-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Latest X-Plane & Community News
Calendar
Downloads
Store
Posts posted by POM
-
-
On 1/21/2022 at 7:44 PM, Fisi said:
Hello,
I'm playing X plane 11 in a three 32 inch monitor setup with a resolution of 5900x 1080, so far i haven't been able to use the HUD because it's unreadable, or scaled too high, I have to stick with such a resolution almost in the hud disk to be able to read it, which then just makes the use useless. See screenshot, this is how I see it when I pull down the HUD when I'm flying.
So my question would be if there might be a way in the future to make the HUD Projection font smaller or larger, as well as move it left, right, up, down so that we can adjust it as we need to make it readable.I have a lot of fun and I think the HS CL 650 is the best plane I could ever buy for a Flightsim and the HUD issue doesn't really bother me, I just fly without using it, just wanted to draw attention to the fact that in a three monitor setup and larger resolutions, the HUD is not usable.
Perhaps some of you share the same experience.
Thx@all + Thx for the Amazing work, I love this Airplane:-)
Looks like your seating position is a bit off, it has to be perfect for HUD to work, the white ball on the centre pillar has to perfectly overlap the yellow one. There is no way to get around that as the HUD has to conform to the outside view.
-
1
-
-
TorqueSim BN-2B Par Avion VH-AEU
View File
Par Avion livery for the TorqueSim Islander.
-
Submitter
-
Submitted02/07/2021
-
Category
-
Livery For
-
X-Plane Version(s)X-Plane 11
-
-
@Aleksandar Harder does not necessarily mean more realistic and X-Plane ground handling is a prime example of that.
-
Stability augmentation should be off at all times, no matter the aircraft, unless you have really, really noisy joystick at which point just get a new one.
-
Stability augmentation should be off, ALWAYS (unless you have really, really bad and noisy joystick)
As far as sensitivity goes, Toto recommends 0, there is custom code that simulates air resistance on control surfaces, you might still want to add a little bit if your joystick has little travel.
-
I think that Toto wanted people to learn how to operate an aircraft properly instead of just neglecting it, that's why all the maintenance stuff is not optional. If you are not into that your best bet would probably be just to create a new airframe each time.
-
1
-
-
44 minutes ago, CDNCAVOK said:
I have never had issues with the CRJ and IXEG. The better way of doing business is offering the product at a pre-release price informing customers that the product is not quite ready and requires further beta testing to work out the kinks, not selling at full price as if it is ready to go!
If you want to waste your valuable time beta testing go ahead, but I am on a tight schedule so I cannot waste hours on end with my hobby, I only have a few set hours a week!
I have been helpful in confirming the same problem others have regarding the brakes not releasing and terramax continuously looping. So there is a serious issue when you cannot even experience the product on it's release date! I also have a hangar full of other products from other publishers without serious issue's on their release bu rather subtle iprovements afterwards.
If I buy a hockey net with holes, yes I will bring it back for a refund!
Seriously, expecting any kind complex software to be released 100% bug free is just being naive, it is impossible. If you run into issues during the first few days after release you cannot be surprised, the devs are actively working to fix all the issues and 2 patches have already been released, not much else can be done. The plane has been in beta for a while, you could see A LOT of people flying it live on twitch without any of the issues you have mentioned. You can beta test as much as you want, in the end you will have more users than you had testers and therefore they will find bugs that have slipped through the cracks.
If you buy a hockey net with holes you bring it back for a refund, you don't go complaining to the manager about how they need to change their manufacturing process and quality control. That won't help anything, you just go to the store and they will fix it or give you another one. These things happen.
-
2
-
-
4 minutes ago, CDNCAVOK said:
I appreciate all the hard work that has gone into plane, but I personally feel it is a beta product and I am not the type of person who enjoys beta testing. Since yesterday I have spent hours trying to get this bird of the ground, with version 1, 1.01 and 1.02! The brakes are stuck, although I follow the proper procedure, then there is some sort of conflict with terramax which keeps reloading the autumn scenery a LFBT etc.
I"ve asked for a refund via paypal. Once the product is stable I will buy it again. I own iXEG, CRJ-200 and Terramax, and this is the worst release I have ever experienced in any product.
Please fix it, then release it!
Regards
This is one of the smoothest releases of a complex addon that I have seen. There are still much bigger issues in the other products you have mentioned long after their release.
I get that you just spent a lot of money on something that has some issues (that's bound to happen to you at some point if you buy stuff day one), but maybe trying to explain your issues better and trying to get support from the devs might be a better idea than just yelling in the forums and trying to get refund through paypal.
-
1
-
[FIXED v1.2r3] 1000ft aircraft save state triggers ground spoilers on idle
in Technical Support
Posted · Edited by POM
I have the same issue, after using the 1000ft autosave, the wheels spin and will keep on spinning forever, meaning that ground spoilers will extend when throttle is at idle.