-
Posts
71 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Latest X-Plane & Community News
Calendar
Downloads
Store
Posts posted by HerrSchwarz
-
-
Just now, Tom Stian said:
Hello
Have you tried to increase your altitude on the MCP ?
Thanks for your reply, but i don´t wanna try any workarounds anymore im tired.
Have a nice weekend. -
-
10 minutes ago, stringden said:
Do we have wingflex, I cant see it. This is very important for realistic atmosphere .
We have A LOT of other problems, sir. I think things like that can wait!
Have a nice weekend everyone. :-)
- 2
-
Here is the Next one.
Hope you´ll enjoy. :-)
feel free to donate. It is absoulutely not necessary at all, but of curse much appreciated. :-) paypal.me/SchwarzDavid
-
Hey guys,
i just finished my first Liverie. Yes its the first i´ve ever made.
Its the old Transavia one.
Hope you´ll enjoy it.
Cheers and have a nice day, David
Btw. More to come.
feel free to donate. It is absoulutely not necessary at all, but of curse much appreciated. :-) paypal.me/SchwarzDavid
V.1.1 : - Added the correct Tail Number- improved the Logos on the bottom of the airplane ( On the Picture is still the old one )
- 2
-
On 1.5.2016 at 6:43 AM, poodster said:
If you call completing multiple flights without an issue defective, then yes I did!
I hope to let you know, even the real 733 has had fms bugs.
Well i´d love to have your Version then, Mister. Could you send me your installer pls?
Hope you don´t get this wrong, but this is very hard to believe.
-
1 hour ago, tkyler said:
This is definitely one of the areas I was on the fence about. I have wavered back and forth over this, and totally see your point. I'll shed some light on why I went the other way.
When I would get a description from Jan about how the FMS behaved....I would assess the workload to implement. I could "block off that feature", toss out some INVALID message" to the user when they tried it....and be done with it. NO gizmo crashes risked, etc. The problem was, that IF we wanted to implemented such a feature in the future, then it had to be wired into existing functionality....and the wiring generally proved to be extensive enough that you just could not leave the feature hanging or effectively block it off....it was either, "put it in now, or risk too much effort adding (motivational problems) it in".
So, we really wanted to make this thing as real as we could....and so we just had to say, "lets go for it"....and we did that in so many areas, we just couldn't test all the permutations resulting from the extra options and functionality. THIS is what I refer to as the "rite of passage" or "pain of childbirth". ...and why I say this couldn't go any other way. IF we want a super accurate FMS, then we just have to put it out there, see what users do that we did not, and fix it. Take the punches....and one day, the bruises will heal and we'll have this wonderful thing we envisioned years ago...and it will be good. So keep punching, we'll keep fixing and get there.....but its Sunday, no fixing today Family time.
-tkyler
I think you qouted the wrong person here. I am not punching in any way. I´d like to point that out again. Never did that!
-
Just now, Ben Russell said:
"Programmer to programmer"; this bug report is useless. *delete*
Don´t get mad, Ben.
- 1
-
5 minutes ago, Ben Russell said:
We're trying. And we're actually converting the FSX/P3D masses... (according to the rest of the internet...)
Anyone that thinks they can do it better is welcome to do so, plenty have already tried.
Thanks again to everyone making constructive efforts to track down the bugs.
If you look at my profile you´ll see, i say that over and over again to ppl who are complaigning. I trust you guys, i have faith in your qualitiy product but i am aware that it´ll take some time. All good.
-
41 minutes ago, ixam500 said:
Well, I don`t really get your point here. If you look at it realistically, this plane is already the most EXTENSIVE for X-Plane and could easily be in the top-league of FSX. Furthermore, it has been released for 1 week, how should they "fix" every bug (its also impossible to bring a totally bug-free product on the market, as there is too many combinations of hardware, scenery, plug-ins and add-ons). Look at software released by big players in the industry, where they have 200 people working on a project with a way higher budget. IXEG are I think 5 or 6 people who are more or less "quereinsteiger". Of course, its not fully complete, but calling it a "Beta" is IMO degrading to the team and their efforta for the past 5 years.
Cheers
You´re right, you clearly missed my point here. Its not about the features it offers, its about how reliably they work. And some of them simply don´t work as intended. Look at the Bug Forums you will see one or two Bug Reports. If they´d sell this as kind of an early access airplane, im sure no one would complaign. And like i mentioned before. If you are happy, fine. Quiet a few ppl are not. Whats the point of trying to convince them ? Its still the best looking and mostly in depth simulated airplane out there for x Plane 10. Sure. But still.. and i don´t want to repeat myself here but there is stuff to work on, which they do. And thats why i am not mad at all i have trust. But i´m just sayin, that i can understand, that ppl are complaiging! Hopefully it clearified my point for you.
-
5 minutes ago, Litjan said:
We agree that there are still a lot of lingering problems - but assure you that we are working hard to get these problems taken care of. I am sorry that you are having a bad time with the product.
Jan
No anger on my side. I have trust in you, since you´re working very hard every day. But i can absolutely understand the poeple who are disappointed. The sad part is, V 1.0.1 worked relativly fine, now V1.0.2 screwed up a lot of other things so my anticipation to fly is just gone since Friday night. I hope it comes back at some point.
-
17 hours ago, bigbasspic said:
I bought this plugin mainly because of the FMC. After some handflown patterns (beautiful!) I tried the simple route EDDW EDDH. The plane never reached its destination, because this gismo-CRAP crashed every time. All plugs disabled. But at least it got off the ground.
After update 1.0.2. it crashes at the point I execute this really simple plan. GizmoLog.txt attached. No, I'm not going to make a video of this.After all the things IXEG said about their software prior to release I can only say this is RIDICULOUS.
Being a programmer myself, I would be ashamed if I would sell software like this.
Benjamin
Ya its pretty much a Beta for 75$. Was thinking that to myself the other day. It will take a long time. But i hope some time next year it will be fully functional.
-
Great! You guys rock! Thank you for your hard work and now.. enjoy your weekend!
-
Just now, Cameron said:
I can be humorous with you, just not on the language.
you´re welcome, sir!
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Cameron said:
Consider the fact there are younger people here, please.
Thank you.
I did thats why i did´nt say F***
Edited it! ♥ -
57 minutes ago, mraviator said:
Yeah, I'm not exactly sure what all the community belly aching is about.
In my mind, this was a great 1.0 launch and even better 1.01 quick-turnaround. I've flown this aircraft for over 25 hours now, have also run into the occasional FMS hiccup (but not since 1.01) and maybe a little weight input difficulties. But, seriously, this is one nicely modeled aircraft.
I had zero issues getting up and running with this aircraft (I've been doing this too long...), so the lack of proper documentation is a non-issue to me as the flow is very similar to the 727 or 757/767 (if you get right down to it...). I'm always interested in runway and climb/cruise/descent performance versus real-world aircraft and found some online sources against which I checked. I think the team has nailed that one as well, which pleases me to no end.
Ignore the whiners, there are always some. This is a great aircraft, no matter how you slice it.
Well the whiners how you´re calling them are the ppl who give a actual **** about the product. and they are the guys who are helping with bugreports to IMPROVE the Airplane even more as it is coming along. Just sayin. So to make a point.. not everyone who is complaigning is whining. Just helping you to understand ppl who are unhappy with some bugs DO CARE! And they should everything but beeing ignored!
And i dont know anyone who is complaigning about certain bugs and stuff who has not at least once posted about the fact, that he is absolutely loving this outstanding aircraft, Im very sure about that. -
On 27.4.2016 at 6:48 PM, Jovabra said:
Fully agree with this!
To rotate the knobs is very annoying. Precise control is impossible
Regards John
But turning your mousewheel like a sick freak is´nt? it can be even worse tbh. But i guess it comes down to personal preference .. as allways..
-
On 27.4.2016 at 6:59 PM, Cameron said:
I wouldn't call it impossible at all.
True! I am not a fan of scroll wheels at all ,but i have to admit that i´d like a bit less sensitivity espacially on the V/S Knob since it is extremly sensitiv.
-
7 minutes ago, Tim013 said:
What click sound? My FMC is silent. No click sound, and not EXEC tone. I assumed it was supposed to be that way.
Tim
I posted a Bug Report Video the other day. U can hear the sound we´re talking about very well. I´ll link it right here for you. did i mention that i love the sound?
-
5 minutes ago, crisk73 said:
Is she a new beta tester? That's how you can catch even the most unexpected bugs!!
Yeah.. well her name is Shirley and she´s from the UK. She´s also good at fondling my hair but lets not get into that right now and just say YA! Shes a Beta Tester!
-
-
7 hours ago, Cameron said:
This isn't a 757, 767, or 777 after all.
Ya Thank God!
-
On 25.4.2016 at 3:57 PM, Tom Stian said:
Yea. Would be nice if the aircraft was in the state you left it in. COM/NAV freq, fuel, switches etc etc..
That would be absolutely fantastic.
Fuel amountRadio Freq.
and i would be very happy. :-)
Would help even more with the perception of taking the plane over from a nother crew. I absolutely love the idea. ♥
-
Hold your Horses Mister its too early!
No offence. Just wait some more weeks!
Let them do their work.Its a great airplane, yes, but still they´ll have to fix a lot of stuff and they are very aware of that.
Dont praise the day before nightfall. Way to go.
| Video | Altitude Alert on Ground | IXEG 737 V.1.0.3 | Logfiles Attached |
in Bug Reports
Posted · Edited by HerrSchwarz
Thank you two for clearifying. So this "Bug" is solved and i would be very thankful if the threat will be deleted. I´m gonna delete the Video now.
Again, Thank you and have a nice weekend.
First "wrong" bug report on my side.