mishaikin

I am speechless. The Preacher. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Ben, I am not sure what you are implying by that only a small fraction of linux user will buy your addon? Is it of all the people in the world who use linux but are not sim enthusiasts? And is it the word pirate that comes into mind? Because of all linux xplane users all interested in jets will buy it, I don't know other way and that may be a few hundreds linux xplane users. If you imply pirating, then this is very ugly. Usually windows type of people come to ask for help with a pirated addons and it is very shameful when they share their logs ... Anyway, your words are so greedy and offensive that I just decided that will not buy ixeg737 though I have windows10 installed, not until it becomes crossplatform as the the xplane itself. I have lived until now without it, not big deal, we are not even sure how good it is, only advertisements and insults .... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Hi Ben, I pay for every addon I use, in linux. There are devs (Carenado, Alabeo, FF, Rotate ... ) that make planes compatible with all three platforms supported by x-plane and I buy from them. I will also buy the 737 when it is out though it will cause considerable inconvenience to me ;-) ... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Can't say. It was pretty clean installation with the whole purpose of having windows for the sake of ixeg imminent 737. I generally fly on linux and made that exception because ixeg doesn't like linux (users) but its addon seems promising :-) In ivao forum some people suggested the problem is related to using xplane in 64bit and TS2 being 32bit Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I installed win10 (linux user for most of the time) and couldn't get the ivao plugin to connect to the atc channels on Teamspeak2 using the plane's radio .... spent a few days on that problem. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Here is the scenery_packs.ini attached. I don't know about the lack of engineering ..., it is just the way x-plane works :-) To make detailed and accurate scenery you put more and more objects, polygones, markings, textures on the tarmac and finally you have to buy a new video card as it happened with me. When I was making LBSF v2, my card was EVGA geforce 960 2Gb and with lower rendering options I was getting similar framerates, now with 980Ti I thought initially that would be able to max out everything, but it didn't work that way, especially because some of the rendering options depend on the cpu, not the gpu. Some of the options that I had to make compromise with were number of objects, resolution of the screen, shadows. Also noticed that noaa plugin even in clear weather causes sometimes 7-10 fps drop. Another framerate beast for me is w2xp scenery/library ( I use the osm only version). So, just try EPWA with lower screen resolution, it would be interesting what rate you'll get. Staying at 20 is dangerous. If you fly online when you start using ivao or vatsim plugin, add eventually weather and you will end up at 5. scenery_packs.ini

I'll check my sceneries inj file on Friday, I am not nearby my pc at the moment. These detailed sceneries are real framerate hungry beasts. I prefer to keep the settings so framerate is above 30 to have some buffer for bad plugins and weather. Buying 980Ti I thought will make me able to max graphic settings but this proved not to be true :-). As a consolation I can say that some free sceneries have even lower framerate than EPWA ... for example LBSF v 2 (made by me and a friend). At gate 1 it gives me about 32 :-) with the same settings. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Well, I don't know ... just for your information I don't use many plugins, only xsquawkbox, landing speed, autogate and occasionally noaa weather and ground services. Also my scenery folder contains hd3mesh and osm only version of w2xp apart from other libraries required by some of the free sceneries. Did you try to lower your system resolution (not only xplain's one)? Resolution really matters in relation to framerate. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Sure, here it goes along with two screenshots from the scenery. Default resolution for me is equal to 1920x1080. I tried 2560x1440 but framerate goes to about 30, not to mention this resolution is not very convenient for anything else :-). Different positions also show different frame rate. You can also watch a night landing (same settings) at EPWA on my twitch.tv channel (the same username), the recording (LBSF-EPWA) will be there for about twenty more days.

I have MSI 980Ti Gaming edition and get 42 fpm at gate 20 for example with FF B763 dark and cold .... But then I am not using the maximum resolution, I keep it at 1920x1080 on a 27 inch Dell, also my shadows are 3d on aircraft, no more. So, I guess all depends on rendering settings. By the way my CPU is 3.6 GHz with turbo boost. Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk

Will this plane be compatible with Linux? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk