AngeloM

My hat off to you, great work as usual!

Hello, as far as I see in your log SASL is loaded correctly, so or this log is not the right one or the problem seems not to be SASL related.

It seems that my actual knowledge of the language doesn't make me able to explain my point of view in a understandable way, no problem.

I missed it, probably because I was waiting for Jan. Thank you to point me at it. Sure, but I think that you can very well understand how strange is a fix like that, very unusual to see.

Same thing I asked on the .org but no answer until now.

Oh, ok. Thank you for your answer!

On February, 2 I sent the pm as per Cameron request, I've just noticed that message is still unread so I think I was never considered for the beta. Just wondering why that pm was never read.

Very interesting, thank you very much! I'll wait for the beta!

I really don't know what kind of 'good news' you can find in a repeated post that doesn't add nothing to what we already know. Of course you can dislike even this post, I don't care at all.

You're welcome!

Exactly the same words as the thread posted six days before so no news under the sky.

Shouldn't be the link that you can find in the end of that page, into the Plugins section (this one)?

Not the easiest thing and I think that will involve (or should have involved) a lot of coding.

Great update Tony, thank you very much!!! Will you release a new beta for testing purposes? Angelo

New link for the R2.

Hello Kieran, some years ago Ben wrote on the dev blog four articles about dataref vs command comparison, here're the links: http://developer.x-plane.com/2009/04/datarefs-vs-commands-i-whats-the-difference/ http://developer.x-plane.com/2009/04/datarefs-vs-commands-ii-which-one-should-i-use/ http://developer.x-plane.com/2009/04/datarefs-vs-commands-iii-what-is-my-command-doing/ http://developer.x-plane.com/2009/04/datarefs-vs-commands-iv-duplication/ Personally I found them very interesting, so i hope those will be useful for you in the same way. Angelo

Hello Andras, first of all this experiment is absolutely interesting so I'll follow it very closely, thank you for your work! For a comparison, what about your system configuration? Just to have an idea on what can give "definitely usable FPS" (could a system with 32Gb of ram, a 4770k at 4,3Ghz and a GTX780 OC with 6Gb of Vram be enough?).

Could be this one perhaps?

Ok, found it: I see a old comment (more than a year ago) about the same problem, and I see that this scenery is pretty old (2010) so maybe it's using an object that is no longer included in OSX. You could try this and/or this.

What a great details, amazing video! Can't wait to buy it!!!

Sorry for the misunderstanding, yes I know that's Gloucester I was only wondering where did you found it in order to get it and try it.

As far I can see flood.obj is not a OSX object, nor I find it in all the libraries I have on my system. Unless someone know something more about that object I'd suggest to contact the developer of EGBJ... by the way, where's that scenery?

Attach your log.txt so we can check it.

Well, pleased to be hallucinated then!!!

Oh, that's interesting! Aliases were working until Mavericks, I'll try symlinks asap thank you very much!