Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

No. In fact, the reverse is true: the B77L (777-200LR) is more efficient than the B77W (777-300ER). The B77L has a higher MTOW and shorter takeoff run at MTOW than the B77W. The B77L's engines provide about 100 kN more thrust than the B77W's. Furthermore, the wingspan on the B77W is shorter than the B77L.

 

The B77W is intended for shorter flights than the B77L, which is why it doesn't have the power nor performance requirements of the B77L; its range is about 7725 nm whereas the B77L's range is about 9400 (both at max payload).

Edited by psanker
Posted (edited)

The B77L has a higher MTOW and shorter takeoff run at MTOW than the B77W. The B77L's engines provide about 100 kN more thrust than the B77W's. Furthermore, the wingspan on the B77W is shorter than the B77L.

 

The 777-300ER (77W) has a higher MTOW than the 777-200LR (77L) based on Boeing's info. The thrust for the engines on the 77L is the same or slightly lower than the 77W depending on the engine variant. But I believe the 77L has a better power to weight ratio. Finally, the wingspan of the 77L and 77W are equivalent.

 

Sources: 

http://www.boeing.com/boeing/commercial/777family/pf/pf_exterior_lr.page

http://www.boeing.com/boeing/commercial/777family/pf/pf_lrproduct.page?

Edited by dwayne299

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...